Evaluation of acoustic rhinometry in a nasal provocation test with allergic rhinitis
Young Hyo Kim, Tae Yong Yang, Dong Youl Lee, Kook Jin Ko, Seung Ho Shin, Tae Young Jang
Abstract
Young Hyo Kim, Tae Yong Yang, Dong Youl Lee, Kook Jin Ko, Seung Ho Shin, Tae Young Jang
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The nasal provocation test is not widely available due to lack of standardized methods and related research. We evaluated the clinical utility of the nasal provocation test using acoustic rhinometry. STUDY DESIGN: All patients underwent skin tests and were graded according to severity of reaction. METHODS: We performed nasal provocation tests using acoustic rhinometry in patients with allergic rhinitis from January 2003 to December 2006. A total of 836 patients participated in our study. The mean age was 36 years and the male:female ratio was 5:4. RESULTS: The mean nasal volume was 10.86 cm(3) and the mean minimal cross-sectional area (MCA) was 0.66 cm(3) before the study. Relationship between the severity of the reaction and change in mean nasal volume and MCA was statistically significant. The relationship between the severity of the reaction against the antigen and the severity of clinical symptoms was also statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The nasal provocation test can be helpful in evaluating the severity of allergic rhinitis. However, we must be careful in interpreting the results alone.
OpenAlex reports 26 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
OBJECTIVE: The nasal provocation test is not widely available due to lack of standardized methods and related research. We evaluated the clinical utility of the nasal provocation test using acoustic rhinometry. STUDY DESIGN: All patients underwent skin tests and were graded according to severity of reaction. METHODS: We performed nasal provocation tests using acoustic rhinometry in patients with allergic rhinitis from January 2003 to December 2006. A total of 836 patients participated in our study. The mean age was 36 years and the male:female ratio was 5:4. RESULTS: The mean nasal volume was 10.86 cm(3) and the mean minimal cross-sectional area (MCA) was 0.66 cm(3) before the study. Relationship between the severity of the reaction and change in mean nasal volume and MCA was statistically significant. The relationship between the severity of the reaction against the antigen and the severity of clinical symptoms was also statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The nasal provocation test can be helpful in evaluating the severity of allergic rhinitis. However, we must be careful in interpreting the results alone.
Key concepts: Acoustic rhinometry, Provocation test, Medicine, Nasal provocation test, Nose, Allergy, Dermatology, Anesthesia