2018Jurnal Ilmiah Bina BahasaOpen access

LANGUAGE FUNCTION IN HILLARY CLINTON’S SPEECHES ON YOUTUBE

Bunga Darma Uli, Komala Dwi Syaputri

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

This study discussed the language function in Hillary Clinton’s speeches on YouTube. The objectives of this study were to identify and describe the types of the language function found in her speeches as well as to describe the meaning of every language function she used in her speeches. There were four of her speeches were analyzed in the study. Moreover, the descriptive qualitative approach was used in analyzing the speeches. The data were classified into six types of language function according to Jacobson’s theory: referential function, emotive function, conative function, phatic function, metalingual function, and phoetic function. There were 8 types of language function and meaning expressions found in the analyzed speeches. Each type of it was not equally found. The highest was 3 (40%) referential function, 2 (20%), phoetic function, 1 (10%) emotive function, 1 (10%) phatic function, and 1 (10%) metalingual function. The result of the study showed that all the analyzed speeches contained language function. Therefore, it was clear that Hillary instilled the language function in order to make her speeches understandable and meaningful to the audience.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study discussed the language function in Hillary Clinton’s speeches on YouTube. The objectives of this study were to identify and describe the types of the language function found in her speeches as well as to describe the meaning of every language function she used in her speeches. There were four of her speeches were analyzed in the study. Moreover, the descriptive qualitative approach was used in analyzing the speeches. The data were classified into six types of language function according to Jacobson’s theory: referential function, emotive function, conative function, phatic function, metalingual function, and phoetic function. There were 8 types of language function and meaning expressions found in the analyzed speeches. Each type of it was not equally found. The highest was 3 (40%) referential function, 2 (20%), phoetic function, 1 (10%) emotive function, 1 (10%) phatic function, and 1 (10%) metalingual function. The result of the study showed that all the analyzed speeches contained language function. Therefore, it was clear that Hillary instilled the language function in order to make her speeches understandable and meaningful to the audience.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study discussed the language function in Hillary Clinton’s speeches on YouTube. The objectives of this study were to identify and describe the types of the language function found in her speeches as well as to describe the meaning of every language function she used in her speeches. There were four of her speeches were analyzed in the study. Moreover, the descriptive qualitative approach was used in analyzing the speeches. The data were classified into six types of language function according to Jacobson’s theory: referential function, emotive function, conative function, phatic function, metalingual function, and phoetic function. There were 8 types of language function and meaning expressions found in the analyzed speeches. Each type of it was not equally found. The highest was 3 (40%) referential function, 2 (20%), phoetic function, 1 (10%) emotive function, 1 (10%) phatic function, and 1 (10%) metalingual function. The result of the study showed that all the analyzed speeches contained language function. Therefore, it was clear that Hillary instilled the language function in order to make her speeches understandable and meaningful to the audience.

Key concepts: Emotive, Function (biology), Meaning (existential), Language function, Linguistics, Psychology, Computer science, Epistemology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
LANGUAGE FUNCTION IN HILLARY CLINTON’S SPEECHES ON YOUTUBE — Research Paper | ScholarLens