2019Journal of Agriculture and Food SciencesOpen access

Comparative evaluation on nutrient, anti-nutrients and phytochemical content of melon (Curcubita citrullus L.), pie melon (Cucurbita ficifolia) and water melon (Citrullus lanatus) seed flours

Joy Adaku Amadi, Chinyere P. Ezenwa, I.C. Ezeh

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

The study sought to evaluate the nutrient, anti-nutrients and phytochemical content of melon (curcubita citrullus l.), pie melon (curcubita ficilia) and water melon (citrullus lanatus) seed flours. The melon seeds were dehulled manually and sorted to remove extraneous materials and bad seeds. It was sundried, milled and stored in an air-tight polyethylene bag. Pie melon and watermelon fruits were washed, cut with knife, it was deseeded from pulp, cleaned and washed properly with tap water respectively. They were air-dried, dehulled, sundried, milled and stored in an air tight polyethylene bag. Proximate, mineral, anti-nutrient and phytochemical composition of flour samples were carried out in triplicates using standard methods. One way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Turkey’s test were used to separate and compare the means. Results shows that pie melon was significantly (p<0.05) higher in protein (40.24%), ash (5.00%), fat (23.43%), and fibre (4.89%). Watermelon (2.99%) was higher in moisture and carbohydrate (38.61%). Mineral composition of watermelon, pie melon and melon seed shows that calcium (40.00%), potassium (590.00%) and sodium (4.02%) were significantly (p<0.05) higher in watermelon while magnesium (42.50%), iron (252.10%) and copper (106.25%) were significantly (p<0.05) higher in pie melon. Watermelon was significantly higher in hydrogen cyanide (1.42mg/100g) and oxalate (5.13mg/100g). Tannin was not significantly (p>0.05) different among the melon seed varieties though higher in watermelon. Flavonoid (3.00mg/100g) and phenol (0.86mg/100g) was significantly (p<0.05) in watermelon while pie melon had the lowest value. The different varieties of melon seeds studied shows that they are all rich in macro and micro nutrient but was significantly higher in pie melon. Pie melon production and consumption should be encouraged among different age groups.Keywords: Pie melon, water melon, melon, nutritional composition

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The study sought to evaluate the nutrient, anti-nutrients and phytochemical content of melon (curcubita citrullus l.), pie melon (curcubita ficilia) and water melon (citrullus lanatus) seed flours. The melon seeds were dehulled manually and sorted to remove extraneous materials and bad seeds. It was sundried, milled and stored in an air-tight polyethylene bag. Pie melon and watermelon fruits were washed, cut with knife, it was deseeded from pulp, cleaned and washed properly with tap water respectively. They were air-dried, dehulled, sundried, milled and stored in an air tight polyethylene bag. Proximate, mineral, anti-nutrient and phytochemical composition of flour samples were carried out in triplicates using standard methods. One way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Turkey’s test were used to separate and compare the means. Results shows that pie melon was significantly (p<0.05) higher in protein (40.24%), ash (5.00%), fat (23.43%), and fibre (4.89%). Watermelon (2.99%) was higher in moisture and carbohydrate (38.61%). Mineral composition of watermelon, pie melon and melon seed shows that calcium (40.00%), potassium (590.00%) and sodium (4.02%) were significantly (p<0.05) higher in watermelon while magnesium (42.50%), iron (252.10%) and copper (106.25%) were significantly (p<0.05) higher in pie melon. Watermelon was significantly higher in hydrogen cyanide (1.42mg/100g) and oxalate (5.13mg/100g). Tannin was not significantly (p>0.05) different among the melon seed varieties though higher in watermelon. Flavonoid (3.00mg/100g) and phenol (0.86mg/100g) was significantly (p<0.05) in watermelon while pie melon had the lowest value. The different varieties of melon seeds studied shows that they are all rich in macro and micro nutrient but was significantly higher in pie melon. Pie melon production and consumption should be encouraged among different age groups.Keywords: Pie melon, water melon, melon, nutritional composition

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The study sought to evaluate the nutrient, anti-nutrients and phytochemical content of melon (curcubita citrullus l.), pie melon (curcubita ficilia) and water melon (citrullus lanatus) seed flours. The melon seeds were dehulled manually and sorted to remove extraneous materials and bad seeds. It was sundried, milled and stored in an air-tight polyethylene bag. Pie melon and watermelon fruits were washed, cut with knife, it was deseeded from pulp, cleaned and washed properly with tap water respectively. They were air-dried, dehulled, sundried, milled and stored in an air tight polyethylene bag. Proximate, mineral, anti-nutrient and phytochemical composition of flour samples were carried out in triplicates using standard methods. One way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Turkey’s test were used to separate and compare the means. Results shows that pie melon was significantly (p<0.05) higher in protein (40.24%), ash (5.00%), fat (23.43%), and fibre (4.89%). Watermelon (2.99%) was higher in moisture and carbohydrate (38.61%). Mineral composition of watermelon, pie melon and melon seed shows that calcium (40.00%), potassium (590.00%) and sodium (4.02%) were significantly (p<0.05) higher in watermelon while magnesium (42.50%), iron (252.10%) and copper (106.25%) were significantly (p<0.05) higher in pie melon. Watermelon was significantly higher in hydrogen cyanide (1.42mg/100g) and oxalate (5.13mg/100g). Tannin was not significantly (p>0.05) different among the melon seed varieties though higher in watermelon. Flavonoid (3.00mg/100g) and phenol (0.86mg/100g) was significantly (p<0.05) in watermelon while pie melon had the lowest value. The different varieties of melon seeds studied shows that they are all rich in macro and micro nutrient but was significantly higher in pie melon. Pie melon production and consumption should be encouraged among different age groups.Keywords: Pie melon, water melon, melon, nutritional composition

Key concepts: Melon, Citrullus lanatus, Citrullus, Chemistry, Sugar, Horticulture, Tannin, Phytochemical

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative evaluation on nutrient, anti-nutrients and phytochemical content of melon (Curcubita citrullus L.), pie melon (Cucurbita ficifolia) and water melon (Citrullus lanatus) seed flours — Research Paper | ScholarLens