Treatment Results of Vulvar Intraepithelial Neoplasia in 16 Women
Cüneyt Eftal Taner, İrem Şenyuva, Şevki Göksun Gökulu
Abstract
Cüneyt Eftal Taner, İrem Şenyuva, Şevki Göksun Gökulu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Clinical outcome after surgical treatment of vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN). STUDY DESIGN; 16 women with vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia were reviewed. Histologic diagnosis was based on classification of the International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Diseases (ISSVD). RESULTS: All cases had unifocal lesions in vulvar examination. In 13 cases (81,5%) lesions were white, in 2 cases (12,5%) lesions were papillary in apprereance and in a case ( 6%) there was an ulcerative lesion. In all cases diameter of the vulvar lesions were less than 2 cm. Local excision was performed for VIN 1 lesions. VIN2 and VIN3 lesions underwent simple vulvectomy. Imiquimod therapy was prefferred for a case with VIN3 lesion who refused surgery. In a case with VIN3 lesion squamous cell carcinoma in situ diagnosed after vulvectomy operation. Recurrence of disease has not yet been diagnosed during the follow up period. CONCLUSION: VIN lesions should be surgically treated and careful long term surveillence is mandatory.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
OBJECTIVE: Clinical outcome after surgical treatment of vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN). STUDY DESIGN; 16 women with vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia were reviewed. Histologic diagnosis was based on classification of the International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Diseases (ISSVD). RESULTS: All cases had unifocal lesions in vulvar examination. In 13 cases (81,5%) lesions were white, in 2 cases (12,5%) lesions were papillary in apprereance and in a case ( 6%) there was an ulcerative lesion. In all cases diameter of the vulvar lesions were less than 2 cm. Local excision was performed for VIN 1 lesions. VIN2 and VIN3 lesions underwent simple vulvectomy. Imiquimod therapy was prefferred for a case with VIN3 lesion who refused surgery. In a case with VIN3 lesion squamous cell carcinoma in situ diagnosed after vulvectomy operation. Recurrence of disease has not yet been diagnosed during the follow up period. CONCLUSION: VIN lesions should be surgically treated and careful long term surveillence is mandatory.
Key concepts: Medicine, Vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia, Vulvectomy, Lesion, Vulvar cancer, Vulva, Vulvar Carcinoma, Carcinoma in situ