A Comparison of Myofascial Release and Ultrasound in the Treatment of Musculoskeletal Pain
Dianna Lynn Bishop
Abstract
Open-access reader
Dianna Lynn Bishop
Abstract
Open-access reader
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of myofascial release (MFR) compared to ultrasound (US) in treating musculoskeletal pain. Data in the form of number of trigger points, active range-of-motion of the affected joint, pain scale measurement, and a Treatment Response Questionnaire score, were collected. The Mann-Whitney U value supported that the MFR group outranked the US group 47 percent when ranking the percent change in trigger point number from pre to post treatment. The Mann-Whitney U value supported that the MFR group outranked the US group in pain scale measurement. Kruskal-Wallis H value supported that MFR subjects appeared to make a greater improvement. The Mann-Whitney U value supported that the MFR group outranked the US group 46 percent when ranking the change in range-of-motion. The Mann-Whitney U value supported that the MFR group outranked answers in the US group 55 times.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of myofascial release (MFR) compared to ultrasound (US) in treating musculoskeletal pain. Data in the form of number of trigger points, active range-of-motion of the affected joint, pain scale measurement, and a Treatment Response Questionnaire score, were collected. The Mann-Whitney U value supported that the MFR group outranked the US group 47 percent when ranking the percent change in trigger point number from pre to post treatment. The Mann-Whitney U value supported that the MFR group outranked the US group in pain scale measurement. Kruskal-Wallis H value supported that MFR subjects appeared to make a greater improvement. The Mann-Whitney U value supported that the MFR group outranked the US group 46 percent when ranking the change in range-of-motion. The Mann-Whitney U value supported that the MFR group outranked answers in the US group 55 times.
Key concepts: Myofascial pain, Musculoskeletal pain, Medicine, Physical therapy, Myofascial pain syndrome, Physical medicine and rehabilitation, Myofascial release, Alternative medicine