Quality assessment of urban environment
Elena Viktorovna Ganebnykh, Tatyana Burtseva, Nataliya Mironova, Oksana Gennadyevna Feoktistova
Abstract
Open-access reader
Elena Viktorovna Ganebnykh, Tatyana Burtseva, Nataliya Mironova, Oksana Gennadyevna Feoktistova
Abstract
Open-access reader
Socio-economic and ecological stability of an urban area is closely related to environmental management. The best way to determine the urban environment is the quality rating system. The research aimed to determine indicators of urban development quality and their weight coefficient using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method. The study reveals five main groups of indicators where safety and ecology of the urban environment has the biggest influence on the quality of urban development.
OpenAlex reports 17 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Socio-economic and ecological stability of an urban area is closely related to environmental management. The best way to determine the urban environment is the quality rating system. The research aimed to determine indicators of urban development quality and their weight coefficient using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method. The study reveals five main groups of indicators where safety and ecology of the urban environment has the biggest influence on the quality of urban development.
Key concepts: Analytic hierarchy process, Quality (philosophy), Environmental quality, Urban environment, Environmental resource management, Environmental planning, Urban planning, Urban ecosystem