The Adam Smith Problem or a Social Science Problem? Revisiting Adam Smith’s Anthropology
Jean-Daniel Boyer
Abstract
Jean-Daniel Boyer
Abstract
The point of this article is to define man’s universal character traits, as Adam Smith describes them in his work, in order to show that the Adam Smith Problem is in fact not grounded. It results more from an anachronistic understanding of his work, and bears witness to the issues raised by the separation of the social sciences branches. JEL classification – B12
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The point of this article is to define man’s universal character traits, as Adam Smith describes them in his work, in order to show that the Adam Smith Problem is in fact not grounded. It results more from an anachronistic understanding of his work, and bears witness to the issues raised by the separation of the social sciences branches. JEL classification – B12
Key concepts: Adam smith, Anachronism, Witness, Character (mathematics), Sociology, Order (exchange), Epistemology, Philosophy