2019The Egyptian Journal of Hospital MedicineOpen access

Evaluation Study of Different Methods of Refraction in Hyperopic Lasik

Abd El Rahman Fathy Sayed Ahmed, Hassan Abd El Wahab, Mahmoud M Saleh

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Background: hyperopia, also known as far-sightedness, is a common type of refractive error in which light is focused behind, instead of on, the retina. This causes close objects to be blurry, while far objects may appear normal. Aim: this was evaluation study between different methods of preoperative refraction detection in hyperopic lasik including cycloplegic, manifest and wave front refraction for all patients and according to best-corrected visual acuity we do refractive surgery and analyze postoperative refraction outcome. Patients and Methods: the current study was carried out on thirty-four eyes of eighteen patients. All patients had primary hyperopia with or without hyperopic astigmatism. All patients were informed about the limitations and risks of the procedure. All patients signed an informed consent. Results: In hyperopic spherical group, the mean preoperative spherical equivalent regarding wavefront refraction was + 3.36 ± 1.26 (range + 1.70 to + 5.39 D). 6 months post operatively, it became + 0.35 ± 0.36 (rang + 0.12 to +0.90 D). In hyperopic astigmatic group, the mean preoperative spherical equivalent regarding wave-front refraction was + 3.13 ± 2.08 (range + 1.0 to +5.63D). 6 months post operatively, it became + 0.74 ± 0.43 (range + 0.12 to + 1.63D) and for Cycloplegic auto-refraction, it became + 0.92 ± 0.46 (range + 0.25 to + 1.74D). Conclusion: laser in situ keratomileusis for hyperopia, hyperopic astigmatism is a safe, effective and predictable technique. However, modification in the nomogram is needed in order to achieve good results.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background: hyperopia, also known as far-sightedness, is a common type of refractive error in which light is focused behind, instead of on, the retina. This causes close objects to be blurry, while far objects may appear normal. Aim: this was evaluation study between different methods of preoperative refraction detection in hyperopic lasik including cycloplegic, manifest and wave front refraction for all patients and according to best-corrected visual acuity we do refractive surgery and analyze postoperative refraction outcome. Patients and Methods: the current study was carried out on thirty-four eyes of eighteen patients. All patients had primary hyperopia with or without hyperopic astigmatism. All patients were informed about the limitations and risks of the procedure. All patients signed an informed consent. Results: In hyperopic spherical group, the mean preoperative spherical equivalent regarding wavefront refraction was + 3.36 ± 1.26 (range + 1.70 to + 5.39 D). 6 months post operatively, it became + 0.35 ± 0.36 (rang + 0.12 to +0.90 D). In hyperopic astigmatic group, the mean preoperative spherical equivalent regarding wave-front refraction was + 3.13 ± 2.08 (range + 1.0 to +5.63D). 6 months post operatively, it became + 0.74 ± 0.43 (range + 0.12 to + 1.63D) and for Cycloplegic auto-refraction, it became + 0.92 ± 0.46 (range + 0.25 to + 1.74D). Conclusion: laser in situ keratomileusis for hyperopia, hyperopic astigmatism is a safe, effective and predictable technique. However, modification in the nomogram is needed in order to achieve good results.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background: hyperopia, also known as far-sightedness, is a common type of refractive error in which light is focused behind, instead of on, the retina. This causes close objects to be blurry, while far objects may appear normal. Aim: this was evaluation study between different methods of preoperative refraction detection in hyperopic lasik including cycloplegic, manifest and wave front refraction for all patients and according to best-corrected visual acuity we do refractive surgery and analyze postoperative refraction outcome. Patients and Methods: the current study was carried out on thirty-four eyes of eighteen patients. All patients had primary hyperopia with or without hyperopic astigmatism. All patients were informed about the limitations and risks of the procedure. All patients signed an informed consent. Results: In hyperopic spherical group, the mean preoperative spherical equivalent regarding wavefront refraction was + 3.36 ± 1.26 (range + 1.70 to + 5.39 D). 6 months post operatively, it became + 0.35 ± 0.36 (rang + 0.12 to +0.90 D). In hyperopic astigmatic group, the mean preoperative spherical equivalent regarding wave-front refraction was + 3.13 ± 2.08 (range + 1.0 to +5.63D). 6 months post operatively, it became + 0.74 ± 0.43 (range + 0.12 to + 1.63D) and for Cycloplegic auto-refraction, it became + 0.92 ± 0.46 (range + 0.25 to + 1.74D). Conclusion: laser in situ keratomileusis for hyperopia, hyperopic astigmatism is a safe, effective and predictable technique. However, modification in the nomogram is needed in order to achieve good results.

Key concepts: Medicine, LASIK, Refraction, Keratomileusis, Astigmatism, Nomogram, Subjective refraction, Ophthalmology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source