2015Unpublished venueRequires access

Barriers to comprehensive paratransit replacement

R. Ferro

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

In Chapter 5, four main approaches to paratransit reform were identified in contemporary public transport policy discourse. These approaches included: incorporation of paratransit into formalized operating companies as part of ‘big bang’ bus rapid transit (BRT) implementation; a stepped process entailing operational improvements and corporatization with the aim of paratransit becoming the operators of future conventional large bus, or even BRT, services; operator consolidation and competition regulation through franchising or concessioning; and incremental upgrade of existing paratransit services not necessarily leading to corporatization or formalized bus services. It was argued that of these four approaches, the first has dominated Sub-Saharan African strategy formulation over the past decade, especially in Southern and East Africa. As will be demonstrated later in Chapter 11, West African cities (most notably Abidjan, Accra and Dakar) have not followed this approach to the same extent.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In Chapter 5, four main approaches to paratransit reform were identified in contemporary public transport policy discourse. These approaches included: incorporation of paratransit into formalized operating companies as part of ‘big bang’ bus rapid transit (BRT) implementation; a stepped process entailing operational improvements and corporatization with the aim of paratransit becoming the operators of future conventional large bus, or even BRT, services; operator consolidation and competition regulation through franchising or concessioning; and incremental upgrade of existing paratransit services not necessarily leading to corporatization or formalized bus services. It was argued that of these four approaches, the first has dominated Sub-Saharan African strategy formulation over the past decade, especially in Southern and East Africa. As will be demonstrated later in Chapter 11, West African cities (most notably Abidjan, Accra and Dakar) have not followed this approach to the same extent.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In Chapter 5, four main approaches to paratransit reform were identified in contemporary public transport policy discourse. These approaches included: incorporation of paratransit into formalized operating companies as part of ‘big bang’ bus rapid transit (BRT) implementation; a stepped process entailing operational improvements and corporatization with the aim of paratransit becoming the operators of future conventional large bus, or even BRT, services; operator consolidation and competition regulation through franchising or concessioning; and incremental upgrade of existing paratransit services not necessarily leading to corporatization or formalized bus services. It was argued that of these four approaches, the first has dominated Sub-Saharan African strategy formulation over the past decade, especially in Southern and East Africa. As will be demonstrated later in Chapter 11, West African cities (most notably Abidjan, Accra and Dakar) have not followed this approach to the same extent.

Key concepts: Paratransit, Corporatization, Public transport, Business, Consolidation (business), Competition (biology), Process (computing), Transport engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Barriers to comprehensive paratransit replacement — Research Paper | ScholarLens