2018International Journal of Computing AlgorithmRequires access

A Study on Evaluation Metrics for Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Methods - TOPSIS, COPRAS & GRA

A. Martin, T. Miranda Lakshmi, V. Prasanna Venkatesan

Open publisher page 12 citations

Abstract

Metrics are units of measurement. It is frequently used to mean a set of specific measurements taken on a particular process. They are very important to estimate the performance of any application. In this study, Multi Criteria Decision Making MCDM methods such as Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution TOPSIS, Complex Proportional Assessment COPRAS and Grey Relational Analysis GRA are taken into consideration. MCDM methods are applied to solve decision problems with different number of conflicting criteria. Generally these techniques are evaluated using the parameters such as time complexity, space complexity, sensitivity analysis and rank reversal. In addition to these existing evaluation parameters two new evaluation parameters such as rank occurrence and repeated ranking are designed. Hence metrics are designed for these evaluation parameters.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Metrics are units of measurement. It is frequently used to mean a set of specific measurements taken on a particular process. They are very important to estimate the performance of any application. In this study, Multi Criteria Decision Making MCDM methods such as Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution TOPSIS, Complex Proportional Assessment COPRAS and Grey Relational Analysis GRA are taken into consideration. MCDM methods are applied to solve decision problems with different number of conflicting criteria. Generally these techniques are evaluated using the parameters such as time complexity, space complexity, sensitivity analysis and rank reversal. In addition to these existing evaluation parameters two new evaluation parameters such as rank occurrence and repeated ranking are designed. Hence metrics are designed for these evaluation parameters.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Metrics are units of measurement. It is frequently used to mean a set of specific measurements taken on a particular process. They are very important to estimate the performance of any application. In this study, Multi Criteria Decision Making MCDM methods such as Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution TOPSIS, Complex Proportional Assessment COPRAS and Grey Relational Analysis GRA are taken into consideration. MCDM methods are applied to solve decision problems with different number of conflicting criteria. Generally these techniques are evaluated using the parameters such as time complexity, space complexity, sensitivity analysis and rank reversal. In addition to these existing evaluation parameters two new evaluation parameters such as rank occurrence and repeated ranking are designed. Hence metrics are designed for these evaluation parameters.

Key concepts: TOPSIS, Multiple-criteria decision analysis, Ranking (information retrieval), Ideal solution, Rank (graph theory), Grey relational analysis, Computer science, Set (abstract data type)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Study on Evaluation Metrics for Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Methods - TOPSIS, COPRAS & GRA — Research Paper | ScholarLens