2018Unpublished venueRequires access

Objectivity and Truth

Lynn Holt

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

The hallmark of objectivity, according to Thomas Nagel, is detachment from perspective. Objectivity is, he says, a method of understanding which seeks to transcend the limitations of more subjective viewpoints. In fact, argues Nagel, objectivity is a matter of degree, with some perspectives being more objective than others by being more detached from individual perspectives. The cultivation of detachment as an ideal of objectivity is indeed so firmly rooted that it may appear simply to be the concept of objectivity. The adoption of the ancient ideal of objectivity requires a move away from what Putnam called criterial rationality, which in turn entails, among other things, the obliteration of any significant distinction between objectivity and subjectivity. The development of truth is twofold, involving the transformation of both potential knower and potential known. When Aristotle says that the intellectual virtues grasp the truth, the use of &s;truth&s; is a metonym.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The hallmark of objectivity, according to Thomas Nagel, is detachment from perspective. Objectivity is, he says, a method of understanding which seeks to transcend the limitations of more subjective viewpoints. In fact, argues Nagel, objectivity is a matter of degree, with some perspectives being more objective than others by being more detached from individual perspectives. The cultivation of detachment as an ideal of objectivity is indeed so firmly rooted that it may appear simply to be the concept of objectivity. The adoption of the ancient ideal of objectivity requires a move away from what Putnam called criterial rationality, which in turn entails, among other things, the obliteration of any significant distinction between objectivity and subjectivity. The development of truth is twofold, involving the transformation of both potential knower and potential known. When Aristotle says that the intellectual virtues grasp the truth, the use of &s;truth&s; is a metonym.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The hallmark of objectivity, according to Thomas Nagel, is detachment from perspective. Objectivity is, he says, a method of understanding which seeks to transcend the limitations of more subjective viewpoints. In fact, argues Nagel, objectivity is a matter of degree, with some perspectives being more objective than others by being more detached from individual perspectives. The cultivation of detachment as an ideal of objectivity is indeed so firmly rooted that it may appear simply to be the concept of objectivity. The adoption of the ancient ideal of objectivity requires a move away from what Putnam called criterial rationality, which in turn entails, among other things, the obliteration of any significant distinction between objectivity and subjectivity. The development of truth is twofold, involving the transformation of both potential knower and potential known. When Aristotle says that the intellectual virtues grasp the truth, the use of &s;truth&s; is a metonym.

Key concepts: Objectivity (philosophy), Philosophy, Epistemology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Objectivity and Truth — Research Paper | ScholarLens