Truth and Objectivity of the Science of History
Liu Jua
Abstract
Liu Jua
Abstract
It is worth considering why the science of history in China pursues truth with no idea of objectivity while the western science of history is born with the sense of objectivity.Truth with no objectivity is one-sided truth; however,one-sided truth is more harmful since it is considered as truth. The function of history books is to recode events and hence pass down the information so the historians are supposed to write historical events objectively. Just is objective,but with subjective judgment. Truth with no objectivity is shaky so the science of history requires both truth and objectivity.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
It is worth considering why the science of history in China pursues truth with no idea of objectivity while the western science of history is born with the sense of objectivity.Truth with no objectivity is one-sided truth; however,one-sided truth is more harmful since it is considered as truth. The function of history books is to recode events and hence pass down the information so the historians are supposed to write historical events objectively. Just is objective,but with subjective judgment. Truth with no objectivity is shaky so the science of history requires both truth and objectivity.
Key concepts: Objectivity (philosophy), Epistemology, Pragmatic theory of truth, Alethiology, Philosophy, Coherence theory of truth