2019•Unpublished venueRequires access

Government Employment and Affirmative Action

Nijole V. Benokraitis, Joe R. Feagin

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This chapter examines the position of women and minorities in federal, state, and local government. Both attitudinal and structural characteristics affect female and minority participation and mobility in government employment. Attitudes toward women, as well as their own attitudes, have hampered female participation and promotion. In 1960 a study of Civil Service Commission referral requests showed that, across all job categories, 29 percent specified men only and 34 percent specified women only. State and local government employment has increased steadily—from 6.3 million employees in 1960 to 12 million in 1975. The groups which seem to have the greatest formal responsibility and power in initiating and maintaining equal employment opportunity in government employment are the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in regard to state and local employees and the Civil Service Commission (CSC) in regard to federal employees—especially the Bureau of Intergovernmental Personnel Programs within the CSC.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter examines the position of women and minorities in federal, state, and local government. Both attitudinal and structural characteristics affect female and minority participation and mobility in government employment. Attitudes toward women, as well as their own attitudes, have hampered female participation and promotion. In 1960 a study of Civil Service Commission referral requests showed that, across all job categories, 29 percent specified men only and 34 percent specified women only. State and local government employment has increased steadily—from 6.3 million employees in 1960 to 12 million in 1975. The groups which seem to have the greatest formal responsibility and power in initiating and maintaining equal employment opportunity in government employment are the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in regard to state and local employees and the Civil Service Commission (CSC) in regard to federal employees—especially the Bureau of Intergovernmental Personnel Programs within the CSC.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter examines the position of women and minorities in federal, state, and local government. Both attitudinal and structural characteristics affect female and minority participation and mobility in government employment. Attitudes toward women, as well as their own attitudes, have hampered female participation and promotion. In 1960 a study of Civil Service Commission referral requests showed that, across all job categories, 29 percent specified men only and 34 percent specified women only. State and local government employment has increased steadily—from 6.3 million employees in 1960 to 12 million in 1975. The groups which seem to have the greatest formal responsibility and power in initiating and maintaining equal employment opportunity in government employment are the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in regard to state and local employees and the Civil Service Commission (CSC) in regard to federal employees—especially the Bureau of Intergovernmental Personnel Programs within the CSC.

Key concepts: Affirmative action, Government (linguistics), Action (physics), Political science, Labour economics, Economics, Law, Philosophy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Government Employment and Affirmative Action — Research Paper | ScholarLens