2015Sokoto Educational ReviewOpen access

THE KANTIAN NOTION OF AESTHETIC JUDGMENT: THE BEAUTIFUL, THE SUBLIME, AND IMPORT FOR AESTHETIC LEARNING

Ike P. Aghaosa

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

This paper is sequel to “Philosophical, Professional and Epistemological Aesthetics: Nexus and Fundamental Issues and Arguments” (Aghaosa, 2014). Using the philosophical methods of language and logical analyses and arguments by analogy; and the methods of documentary inspection, the paper explored what should critically count as aesthetic judgment. Immanuel Kant’s aesthetic judgment of the beautiful and the sublime provided the conceptual framework of analysis .Schopenhauer and Nietzsche’s different hypothetical accounts from the phenomenological perspectives of these aesthetic categories helped to illustrate the effects of the beautiful and the sublime on the aesthetic spectator.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper is sequel to “Philosophical, Professional and Epistemological Aesthetics: Nexus and Fundamental Issues and Arguments” (Aghaosa, 2014). Using the philosophical methods of language and logical analyses and arguments by analogy; and the methods of documentary inspection, the paper explored what should critically count as aesthetic judgment. Immanuel Kant’s aesthetic judgment of the beautiful and the sublime provided the conceptual framework of analysis .Schopenhauer and Nietzsche’s different hypothetical accounts from the phenomenological perspectives of these aesthetic categories helped to illustrate the effects of the beautiful and the sublime on the aesthetic spectator.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper is sequel to “Philosophical, Professional and Epistemological Aesthetics: Nexus and Fundamental Issues and Arguments” (Aghaosa, 2014). Using the philosophical methods of language and logical analyses and arguments by analogy; and the methods of documentary inspection, the paper explored what should critically count as aesthetic judgment. Immanuel Kant’s aesthetic judgment of the beautiful and the sublime provided the conceptual framework of analysis .Schopenhauer and Nietzsche’s different hypothetical accounts from the phenomenological perspectives of these aesthetic categories helped to illustrate the effects of the beautiful and the sublime on the aesthetic spectator.

Key concepts: Sublime, Aesthetic theory, Analogy, Philosophy, Aesthetics, Nexus (standard), Epistemology, Aesthetic experience

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
THE KANTIAN NOTION OF AESTHETIC JUDGMENT: THE BEAUTIFUL, THE SUBLIME, AND IMPORT FOR AESTHETIC LEARNING — Research Paper | ScholarLens