1990•Journal of Park and Recreation AdministrationRequires access

The Rhetoric of Interpretation: More than a Set of Techniques

Patricia A. Stokowski

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

This paper is a response to Rhetoric and Interpretation: A Bridge in Dire Need of Repair by Jeffrey B. Zeiger, which appeared in the Fall 1988 Journal of Park and Recreation Administration (6(3): 14-19). In that article, the author asserts that of should be applied to interpretation in an effort to achieve quality interpretive services. However, this conclusion fails to adequately distinguish the broad, encompassing concept of rhetoric from techniques of public speaking, and therefore is misleading in generalizing about the goals and effects of interpretive discourse. This paper proposes that most interpretive messages are, by nature, already rhetorical, and that rhetorical analyses of interpretive discourses can yield clues about how best to design and deliver potentially effective persuasive interpretive messages.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper is a response to Rhetoric and Interpretation: A Bridge in Dire Need of Repair by Jeffrey B. Zeiger, which appeared in the Fall 1988 Journal of Park and Recreation Administration (6(3): 14-19). In that article, the author asserts that of should be applied to interpretation in an effort to achieve quality interpretive services. However, this conclusion fails to adequately distinguish the broad, encompassing concept of rhetoric from techniques of public speaking, and therefore is misleading in generalizing about the goals and effects of interpretive discourse. This paper proposes that most interpretive messages are, by nature, already rhetorical, and that rhetorical analyses of interpretive discourses can yield clues about how best to design and deliver potentially effective persuasive interpretive messages.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper is a response to Rhetoric and Interpretation: A Bridge in Dire Need of Repair by Jeffrey B. Zeiger, which appeared in the Fall 1988 Journal of Park and Recreation Administration (6(3): 14-19). In that article, the author asserts that of should be applied to interpretation in an effort to achieve quality interpretive services. However, this conclusion fails to adequately distinguish the broad, encompassing concept of rhetoric from techniques of public speaking, and therefore is misleading in generalizing about the goals and effects of interpretive discourse. This paper proposes that most interpretive messages are, by nature, already rhetorical, and that rhetorical analyses of interpretive discourses can yield clues about how best to design and deliver potentially effective persuasive interpretive messages.

Key concepts: Rhetoric, Interpretation (philosophy), Rhetorical question, Recreation, Set (abstract data type), Epistemology, Sociology, Quality (philosophy)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Rhetoric of Interpretation: More than a Set of Techniques — Research Paper | ScholarLens