An interpretive perspective on argumentation: A research editorial
Robert J. Trapp, Pamela J. Benoit
Abstract
Robert J. Trapp, Pamela J. Benoit
Abstract
An interpretive view of communication, with its philosophical assumptions about the nature of persons and the nature of communication, provides a perspective from which a variety of scholars study argumentation. In this essay, arguments supporting the value of the interpretive perspective are advanced, and criticisms of it are answered by showing how those criticisms are grounded in philosophical assumptions contrary to interpretive perspectives.
OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
An interpretive view of communication, with its philosophical assumptions about the nature of persons and the nature of communication, provides a perspective from which a variety of scholars study argumentation. In this essay, arguments supporting the value of the interpretive perspective are advanced, and criticisms of it are answered by showing how those criticisms are grounded in philosophical assumptions contrary to interpretive perspectives.
Key concepts: Argumentation theory, Perspective (graphical), Epistemology, Variety (cybernetics), Value (mathematics), Sociology, Communication studies, Social science