(Dis)Proportionate liability: A critical analysis of Australia's proportionate liability regimes
Clive Hutcheon
Abstract
Clive Hutcheon
Abstract
Proportionate liability has been enacted throughout Australia1 with the objective of limiting a defendant's liability to an amount that represents their role in causing the plaintiff's loss or damage. For some this was a 'laudable idea' 2 that would create parity between community notions of personal responsibility and legal liability. 3 However, the reality is that proportionate liability is exceedingly harsh on plaintiffs and is deeply flawed conceptually…
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Proportionate liability has been enacted throughout Australia1 with the objective of limiting a defendant's liability to an amount that represents their role in causing the plaintiff's loss or damage. For some this was a 'laudable idea' 2 that would create parity between community notions of personal responsibility and legal liability. 3 However, the reality is that proportionate liability is exceedingly harsh on plaintiffs and is deeply flawed conceptually…
Key concepts: Liability, Plaintiff, Strict liability, Limiting, Liability insurance, Business, Actuarial science, Legal liability