The Lottery of Contractual Risk Allocation and Proportionate Liability
Barbara McDonald, John Phillip Carter
Abstract
Barbara McDonald, John Phillip Carter
Abstract
The article explores the relationship between the contractual standard of duty requiring the exercise of care and the imposition of a duty of care in tort. One aspect of that relationship has become a matter of considerable importance in the application of the proportionate liability provisions of the Australian civil liability legislation. Although that legislation applies to claims for purely economic loss and property damage ‘arising from a failure to take reasonable care’, recent decisions have held that requirement to be satisfied by the careless breach of a strict duty. This article argues that this approach is wrong and undesirable.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The article explores the relationship between the contractual standard of duty requiring the exercise of care and the imposition of a duty of care in tort. One aspect of that relationship has become a matter of considerable importance in the application of the proportionate liability provisions of the Australian civil liability legislation. Although that legislation applies to claims for purely economic loss and property damage ‘arising from a failure to take reasonable care’, recent decisions have held that requirement to be satisfied by the careless breach of a strict duty. This article argues that this approach is wrong and undesirable.
Key concepts: Legislation, Lottery, Tort, Duty of care, Duty, Liability, Business, Strict liability