2019Unpublished venueRequires access

Culture as symbol

Kelly Silva

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

This chapter addresses the ways in which customary marriage practices have been carried out and anxieties projected onto them in urban scenarios of postcolonial Timor-Leste. It argues that the negotiation of marriage practices is framed to meet people’s commitments to local and global institutions and their quest to be perceived as modern folk. East Timoreseness is understood to be a product of nationalist and postcolonial government practices which, unlike colonial times, have praised the ‘ownership’ of a particular culture. The chapter examines the role of urban landscapes in colonial and postcolonial times in Timor-Leste, and the ideological ambiguities surrounding customary practices. It discusses marriage formalities in Dili and the expectations and commitments they entail including the moral implications of material exchanges in the making of proper persons and the social networks to which they belong. The chapter describes projects proposed by young people to change the nature of material marriage exchanges in Dili.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter addresses the ways in which customary marriage practices have been carried out and anxieties projected onto them in urban scenarios of postcolonial Timor-Leste. It argues that the negotiation of marriage practices is framed to meet people’s commitments to local and global institutions and their quest to be perceived as modern folk. East Timoreseness is understood to be a product of nationalist and postcolonial government practices which, unlike colonial times, have praised the ‘ownership’ of a particular culture. The chapter examines the role of urban landscapes in colonial and postcolonial times in Timor-Leste, and the ideological ambiguities surrounding customary practices. It discusses marriage formalities in Dili and the expectations and commitments they entail including the moral implications of material exchanges in the making of proper persons and the social networks to which they belong. The chapter describes projects proposed by young people to change the nature of material marriage exchanges in Dili.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter addresses the ways in which customary marriage practices have been carried out and anxieties projected onto them in urban scenarios of postcolonial Timor-Leste. It argues that the negotiation of marriage practices is framed to meet people’s commitments to local and global institutions and their quest to be perceived as modern folk. East Timoreseness is understood to be a product of nationalist and postcolonial government practices which, unlike colonial times, have praised the ‘ownership’ of a particular culture. The chapter examines the role of urban landscapes in colonial and postcolonial times in Timor-Leste, and the ideological ambiguities surrounding customary practices. It discusses marriage formalities in Dili and the expectations and commitments they entail including the moral implications of material exchanges in the making of proper persons and the social networks to which they belong. The chapter describes projects proposed by young people to change the nature of material marriage exchanges in Dili.

Key concepts: Symbol (formal), Communication, Art, Arithmetic, Sociology, Mathematics, Philosophy, Linguistics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Culture as symbol — Research Paper | ScholarLens