2000Proceedings - Vertebrate Pest ConferenceOpen access

Exposure of non-target wildlife to anticoagulant rodenticides in California

C. Hosea Robert

Open full text 49 citations

Abstract

The California Department of Fish and Game collected and analyzed tissue samples from non-target birds and mammals for anticoagulant rodenticides from 1994 through 1999. Many of these animals were collected in recently urbanized areas adjacent to wildlands where they were either found dead or trapped and euthanized as vertebrate pests. The results of the analyses indicate a high frequency of exposure to the anticoagulant rodenticide brodifacoum. Fifty-eight percent of the animals examined had been exposed to brodifacoum, 19% to bromadiolone, 9% to diphacinone, and 8% to chlorophacinone. All of the identified anticoagulants are registered for use to control commensal rodents found in and around structures and are available for sale "over-the-counter" for homeowner use. Brodifacoum and bromadiolone are registered exclusively for commensal rodent control. This paper assesses the frequency of anticoagulant rodenticide residues in tissues of non-target mammalian and avian wildlife and the possible impacts.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The California Department of Fish and Game collected and analyzed tissue samples from non-target birds and mammals for anticoagulant rodenticides from 1994 through 1999. Many of these animals were collected in recently urbanized areas adjacent to wildlands where they were either found dead or trapped and euthanized as vertebrate pests. The results of the analyses indicate a high frequency of exposure to the anticoagulant rodenticide brodifacoum. Fifty-eight percent of the animals examined had been exposed to brodifacoum, 19% to bromadiolone, 9% to diphacinone, and 8% to chlorophacinone. All of the identified anticoagulants are registered for use to control commensal rodents found in and around structures and are available for sale "over-the-counter" for homeowner use. Brodifacoum and bromadiolone are registered exclusively for commensal rodent control. This paper assesses the frequency of anticoagulant rodenticide residues in tissues of non-target mammalian and avian wildlife and the possible impacts.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 49 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The California Department of Fish and Game collected and analyzed tissue samples from non-target birds and mammals for anticoagulant rodenticides from 1994 through 1999. Many of these animals were collected in recently urbanized areas adjacent to wildlands where they were either found dead or trapped and euthanized as vertebrate pests. The results of the analyses indicate a high frequency of exposure to the anticoagulant rodenticide brodifacoum. Fifty-eight percent of the animals examined had been exposed to brodifacoum, 19% to bromadiolone, 9% to diphacinone, and 8% to chlorophacinone. All of the identified anticoagulants are registered for use to control commensal rodents found in and around structures and are available for sale "over-the-counter" for homeowner use. Brodifacoum and bromadiolone are registered exclusively for commensal rodent control. This paper assesses the frequency of anticoagulant rodenticide residues in tissues of non-target mammalian and avian wildlife and the possible impacts.

Key concepts: Brodifacoum, Rodenticide, Wildlife, Rodent, Biology, Anticoagulant, Fish <Actinopterygii>, Toxicology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Exposure of non-target wildlife to anticoagulant rodenticides in California — Research Paper | ScholarLens