2018•Unpublished venueRequires access

A Research on IPv6 Address Auto-Configuration for IoT

Yurong Li, Gengyu Wei

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

The IPv6 address auto-configuration for the nodes in the IoT has always been a core issue that cannot be ignored. In addition to the stateful address auto-configuration method based on the DHCPv6 server, there is also a stateless address auto-configuration method, SLAAC. These two methods have received widespread attention from the industry in the constraint environments for the IoT and the nodes. By analyzing typical IoT network architecture and protocol layered architecture, this paper constructs two IPv6 address automatic configuration methods and the combinations of the two methods. Using Contiki's cooja simulator, a simulation experiment of the automatic IPv6 address allocation method was performed. This paper counts, compares and analyzes the communication overhead and time delay of address assignment. According to the result, a solution is proposed for the address allocation of the Internet of Things node in different application scenarios.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The IPv6 address auto-configuration for the nodes in the IoT has always been a core issue that cannot be ignored. In addition to the stateful address auto-configuration method based on the DHCPv6 server, there is also a stateless address auto-configuration method, SLAAC. These two methods have received widespread attention from the industry in the constraint environments for the IoT and the nodes. By analyzing typical IoT network architecture and protocol layered architecture, this paper constructs two IPv6 address automatic configuration methods and the combinations of the two methods. Using Contiki's cooja simulator, a simulation experiment of the automatic IPv6 address allocation method was performed. This paper counts, compares and analyzes the communication overhead and time delay of address assignment. According to the result, a solution is proposed for the address allocation of the Internet of Things node in different application scenarios.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The IPv6 address auto-configuration for the nodes in the IoT has always been a core issue that cannot be ignored. In addition to the stateful address auto-configuration method based on the DHCPv6 server, there is also a stateless address auto-configuration method, SLAAC. These two methods have received widespread attention from the industry in the constraint environments for the IoT and the nodes. By analyzing typical IoT network architecture and protocol layered architecture, this paper constructs two IPv6 address automatic configuration methods and the combinations of the two methods. Using Contiki's cooja simulator, a simulation experiment of the automatic IPv6 address allocation method was performed. This paper counts, compares and analyzes the communication overhead and time delay of address assignment. According to the result, a solution is proposed for the address allocation of the Internet of Things node in different application scenarios.

Key concepts: Stateful firewall, Computer science, Stateless protocol, IPv6, IPv6 address, Overhead (engineering), Computer network, Internet of Things

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Research on IPv6 Address Auto-Configuration for IoT — Research Paper | ScholarLens