ScholarLens Back to search
2018•e-Competitions BulletinRequires access

The US Supreme Court states that a federal court is not bound by the official interpretation of the foreign law even if it is relevant (Animal science products / Hebei welcome pharmaceutical)

Jeffrey May

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Supreme Court Clarifies Deference Owed a Foreign Government* In a decision that will have a significant impact on antitrust enforcement, particularly private damages actions against…

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Supreme Court Clarifies Deference Owed a Foreign Government* In a decision that will have a significant impact on antitrust enforcement, particularly private damages actions against…

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Supreme Court Clarifies Deference Owed a Foreign Government* In a decision that will have a significant impact on antitrust enforcement, particularly private damages actions against…

Key concepts: Supreme court, Law, Political science, Interpretation (philosophy), Philosophy, Linguistics

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The US Supreme Court states that a federal court is not bound by the official interpretation of the foreign law even if it is relevant (Animal science products / Hebei welcome pharmaceutical) — Research Paper | ScholarLens