ScholarLens Back to search
2018•e-Competitions BulletinRequires access

The US Supreme Court says that judges who determine foreign law in federal courts are not strictly bound by foreign government's statements (Animal Science Products / Hebei Welcome Pharmaceutical)

Jarod M. Bona

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In an antitrust case deciding a non-antitrust-specific issue, the US Supreme Court held in Animal Science Products, Inc. v. Hebei Welcome Pharmaceutical Co.(the Vitamin C Antitrust Litigation)…

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In an antitrust case deciding a non-antitrust-specific issue, the US Supreme Court held in Animal Science Products, Inc. v. Hebei Welcome Pharmaceutical Co.(the Vitamin C Antitrust Litigation)…

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In an antitrust case deciding a non-antitrust-specific issue, the US Supreme Court held in Animal Science Products, Inc. v. Hebei Welcome Pharmaceutical Co.(the Vitamin C Antitrust Litigation)…

Key concepts: Supreme court, Law, Government (linguistics), Political science, Philosophy, Linguistics

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The US Supreme Court says that judges who determine foreign law in federal courts are not strictly bound by foreign government's statements (Animal Science Products / Hebei Welcome Pharmaceutical) — Research Paper | ScholarLens