2019Communications in Soil Science and Plant AnalysisRequires access

Optimizing the Physical and Chemical Properties of Growing Media for the Rooting of Cuttings ofAcacia Mearnsii(de Wild)

S.L. Beck-Pay, Mark Laing

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Rooting media were evaluated to identify problems contributing to poor rooting. Seven media combinations of coir and perlite were investigated, including two sources of coir (‘CG’ and ‘GS’). Final rooting results showed that the 2:1 (‘CG’ coir: perlite), with or without Osmocote® Start, and the 50:50 (‘GS’ coir: perlite) medium supported the best rooting results (19.49%, 19.79% and 17.11%, respectively). Differences between the two sources of coir (‘CG’ and ‘GS’) were evident, with ‘GS’ coir having higher electrical conductivity (EC) levels (0.35 versus 0.28 dsm−1). Greater rooting was also observed in the medium with the ‘CG’ coir, when comparing the 2:1 (‘CG’ coir: perlite) with Osmocote® Start and the 70:30 (‘GS’ coir: perlite) medium. A decline in rooting was observed as the ratio of coir to perlite increased. The media combinations that supported the most rooting had air-filled porosities between 25 and 35% and ECs between 0.2 and 0.4 dsm−1 at Week 0.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Rooting media were evaluated to identify problems contributing to poor rooting. Seven media combinations of coir and perlite were investigated, including two sources of coir (‘CG’ and ‘GS’). Final rooting results showed that the 2:1 (‘CG’ coir: perlite), with or without Osmocote® Start, and the 50:50 (‘GS’ coir: perlite) medium supported the best rooting results (19.49%, 19.79% and 17.11%, respectively). Differences between the two sources of coir (‘CG’ and ‘GS’) were evident, with ‘GS’ coir having higher electrical conductivity (EC) levels (0.35 versus 0.28 dsm−1). Greater rooting was also observed in the medium with the ‘CG’ coir, when comparing the 2:1 (‘CG’ coir: perlite) with Osmocote® Start and the 70:30 (‘GS’ coir: perlite) medium. A decline in rooting was observed as the ratio of coir to perlite increased. The media combinations that supported the most rooting had air-filled porosities between 25 and 35% and ECs between 0.2 and 0.4 dsm−1 at Week 0.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Rooting media were evaluated to identify problems contributing to poor rooting. Seven media combinations of coir and perlite were investigated, including two sources of coir (‘CG’ and ‘GS’). Final rooting results showed that the 2:1 (‘CG’ coir: perlite), with or without Osmocote® Start, and the 50:50 (‘GS’ coir: perlite) medium supported the best rooting results (19.49%, 19.79% and 17.11%, respectively). Differences between the two sources of coir (‘CG’ and ‘GS’) were evident, with ‘GS’ coir having higher electrical conductivity (EC) levels (0.35 versus 0.28 dsm−1). Greater rooting was also observed in the medium with the ‘CG’ coir, when comparing the 2:1 (‘CG’ coir: perlite) with Osmocote® Start and the 70:30 (‘GS’ coir: perlite) medium. A decline in rooting was observed as the ratio of coir to perlite increased. The media combinations that supported the most rooting had air-filled porosities between 25 and 35% and ECs between 0.2 and 0.4 dsm−1 at Week 0.

Key concepts: Coir, Perlite, Cutting, Horticulture, Acacia mearnsii, Botany, Chemistry, Materials science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Optimizing the Physical and Chemical Properties of Growing Media for the Rooting of Cuttings ofAcacia Mearnsii(de Wild) — Research Paper | ScholarLens