ScholarLens Back to search
2005•Concurrences ReviewRequires access

Burden of proof: The ECJ gives some guidance regarding the burden of proof and behavioural remedies Tetra Laval

Stanislas Martin

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

ECJ, 15 February 2005, Commission v. Tetra Laval BV, case C-12/03 P By decision of 30 October 2001 (Case COMP/M.2416), the Commission prohibited the merger between Tetra Laval and Sidel in the…

About this research paper

What this paper is about

ECJ, 15 February 2005, Commission v. Tetra Laval BV, case C-12/03 P By decision of 30 October 2001 (Case COMP/M.2416), the Commission prohibited the merger between Tetra Laval and Sidel in the…

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

ECJ, 15 February 2005, Commission v. Tetra Laval BV, case C-12/03 P By decision of 30 October 2001 (Case COMP/M.2416), the Commission prohibited the merger between Tetra Laval and Sidel in the…

Key concepts: Tetra, Burden of proof, Commission, European commission, Law, Proof of concept, Law and economics, Political science

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Burden of proof: The ECJ gives some guidance regarding the burden of proof and behavioural remedies Tetra Laval — Research Paper | ScholarLens