ScholarLens Back to search
2005•e-Competitions BulletinRequires access

The EU Court of Justice issues ruling against the prohibition decision imposing a duty on the Commission to exercise much greater care in the examination of complex mergers with potential conglomerate effects (Tetra Laval / Sidel)

Neil Ray

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

European Court Raises Bar On The European Commission's Use Of Novel Theories In Merger Cases* On February 15, 2005, the European Court of Justice (“ECJ”) rejected an appeal by the European…

About this research paper

What this paper is about

European Court Raises Bar On The European Commission's Use Of Novel Theories In Merger Cases* On February 15, 2005, the European Court of Justice (“ECJ”) rejected an appeal by the European…

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

European Court Raises Bar On The European Commission's Use Of Novel Theories In Merger Cases* On February 15, 2005, the European Court of Justice (“ECJ”) rejected an appeal by the European…

Key concepts: European court of justice, Appeal, Commission, Law, Political science, Economic Justice, European commission, Duty

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The EU Court of Justice issues ruling against the prohibition decision imposing a duty on the Commission to exercise much greater care in the examination of complex mergers with potential conglomerate effects (Tetra Laval / Sidel) — Research Paper | ScholarLens