Hierarchical Unambiguity
Holger Spakowski, Rahul Tripathi
Abstract
Holger Spakowski, Rahul Tripathi
Abstract
We develop techniques to investigate relativized hierarchical unambiguous computation. We apply our techniques to generalize known constructs involving relativized unambiguity based complexity classes (UP and Promise-UP) to new constructs involving arbitrary higher levels of the relativized unambiguous polynomial hierarchy (UPH). Our techniques are developed on constraints imposed by hierarchical arrangement of unambiguous nondeterministic polynomial-time Turing machines, and so they differ substantially, in applicability and in nature, from standard methods (such as the switching lemma [J. Håstad, Computational Limitations of Small-Depth Circuits, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1987]), which play roles in carrying out similar generalizations. Aside from achieving these generalizations, we resolve a question posed by Cai, Hemachandra, and Vyskoč in [Complexity Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1993, pp. 101–146], on an issue related to nonadaptive Turing access to UP and adaptive smart Turing access to Promise-UP.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
We develop techniques to investigate relativized hierarchical unambiguous computation. We apply our techniques to generalize known constructs involving relativized unambiguity based complexity classes (UP and Promise-UP) to new constructs involving arbitrary higher levels of the relativized unambiguous polynomial hierarchy (UPH). Our techniques are developed on constraints imposed by hierarchical arrangement of unambiguous nondeterministic polynomial-time Turing machines, and so they differ substantially, in applicability and in nature, from standard methods (such as the switching lemma [J. Håstad, Computational Limitations of Small-Depth Circuits, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1987]), which play roles in carrying out similar generalizations. Aside from achieving these generalizations, we resolve a question posed by Cai, Hemachandra, and Vyskoč in [Complexity Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1993, pp. 101–146], on an issue related to nonadaptive Turing access to UP and adaptive smart Turing access to Promise-UP.
Key concepts: Time hierarchy theorem, Polynomial hierarchy, Nondeterministic algorithm, Turing machine, Complexity class, NP, Hierarchy, Turing