1990•Conference on Learning TheoryRequires access

On the complexity of learning minimum time-bounded Turing machines

Ker‐I Ko

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The following problems about time-bounded program-size complexity are studied: (1) for a given string x, a size bound s, and a time bound t, whether there exists a Turing machine of size less than or equal to s that prints x in t moves; (2) for two given finite sets Y and Z of strings, a size bound s, and a time bound t, whether there exists a Turing machine of size less than or equal to s that operates in time t and accepts all $y \in Y$ and rejects all $z \in Z$. These problems are fundamental in complexity theory and feasible learning theory. The complexity of these problems is apparently between P and $NP$, but appears very difficult to classify precisely. These problems are attacked by the approach of relativization. It is shown that for certain variations of the problems, they could be either polynomial-time computable or not polynomial-time computable, depending on different oracles. Furthermore, there are oracles relative to which they are not complete for $NP$ under the polynomial-time Turing red...

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The following problems about time-bounded program-size complexity are studied: (1) for a given string x, a size bound s, and a time bound t, whether there exists a Turing machine of size less than or equal to s that prints x in t moves; (2) for two given finite sets Y and Z of strings, a size bound s, and a time bound t, whether there exists a Turing machine of size less than or equal to s that operates in time t and accepts all $y \in Y$ and rejects all $z \in Z$. These problems are fundamental in complexity theory and feasible learning theory. The complexity of these problems is apparently between P and $NP$, but appears very difficult to classify precisely. These problems are attacked by the approach of relativization. It is shown that for certain variations of the problems, they could be either polynomial-time computable or not polynomial-time computable, depending on different oracles. Furthermore, there are oracles relative to which they are not complete for $NP$ under the polynomial-time Turing red...

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The following problems about time-bounded program-size complexity are studied: (1) for a given string x, a size bound s, and a time bound t, whether there exists a Turing machine of size less than or equal to s that prints x in t moves; (2) for two given finite sets Y and Z of strings, a size bound s, and a time bound t, whether there exists a Turing machine of size less than or equal to s that operates in time t and accepts all $y \in Y$ and rejects all $z \in Z$. These problems are fundamental in complexity theory and feasible learning theory. The complexity of these problems is apparently between P and $NP$, but appears very difficult to classify precisely. These problems are attacked by the approach of relativization. It is shown that for certain variations of the problems, they could be either polynomial-time computable or not polynomial-time computable, depending on different oracles. Furthermore, there are oracles relative to which they are not complete for $NP$ under the polynomial-time Turing red...

Key concepts: Time hierarchy theorem, DTIME, Turing machine, NSPACE, Time complexity, Bounded function, Structural complexity theory, Upper and lower bounds

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
On the complexity of learning minimum time-bounded Turing machines — Research Paper | ScholarLens