2018Journal of Pakistan Association of DermatologistsOpen access

Comparative efficacy of topical 4% hydroquinone vs. 4% hydroquinone plus 10% mandelic acid in the treatment of melasma

Sadia Majeed, Nasir Mahmood, Saeed Ahmed

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the efficacy of topical 4% hydroquinone with combination of 4% hydroquinone and 10% mandelic acid serum in the treatment of melasma. Methods This comparative study was conducted from 1st June, 2017 to 31st December, 2017 at dermatology outpatient (OPD). The trial included 100 patients age ranging from 16 to 50 years, having facial melasma. Patients were randomized to receive topical 4% hydroquinone (group I) or 4% hydroquinone along with 10% mandelic acid (group II). Efficacy was determined at week 24. Results Both groups showed improvement in melasma; however, group II showed better results. At final follow-up, 50% patients in group II showed a response of >50%; however, in group I, only 20% patients showed >50% response. Conclusion The combination of 4% hydroquinone with 10% mandelic acid is more effective in melasma as compared to conventional topical treatment.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the efficacy of topical 4% hydroquinone with combination of 4% hydroquinone and 10% mandelic acid serum in the treatment of melasma. Methods This comparative study was conducted from 1st June, 2017 to 31st December, 2017 at dermatology outpatient (OPD). The trial included 100 patients age ranging from 16 to 50 years, having facial melasma. Patients were randomized to receive topical 4% hydroquinone (group I) or 4% hydroquinone along with 10% mandelic acid (group II). Efficacy was determined at week 24. Results Both groups showed improvement in melasma; however, group II showed better results. At final follow-up, 50% patients in group II showed a response of >50%; however, in group I, only 20% patients showed >50% response. Conclusion The combination of 4% hydroquinone with 10% mandelic acid is more effective in melasma as compared to conventional topical treatment.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the efficacy of topical 4% hydroquinone with combination of 4% hydroquinone and 10% mandelic acid serum in the treatment of melasma. Methods This comparative study was conducted from 1st June, 2017 to 31st December, 2017 at dermatology outpatient (OPD). The trial included 100 patients age ranging from 16 to 50 years, having facial melasma. Patients were randomized to receive topical 4% hydroquinone (group I) or 4% hydroquinone along with 10% mandelic acid (group II). Efficacy was determined at week 24. Results Both groups showed improvement in melasma; however, group II showed better results. At final follow-up, 50% patients in group II showed a response of >50%; however, in group I, only 20% patients showed >50% response. Conclusion The combination of 4% hydroquinone with 10% mandelic acid is more effective in melasma as compared to conventional topical treatment.

Key concepts: Melasma, Hydroquinone, Medicine, Dermatology, Mandelic acid, Randomized controlled trial, Traditional medicine, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative efficacy of topical 4% hydroquinone vs. 4% hydroquinone plus 10% mandelic acid in the treatment of melasma — Research Paper | ScholarLens