2012Faṣlnāmah-i bīmārīhā-yi pūstRequires access

Efficacy and safety of azelaic acid 20% plus hydroquinone 5% in the management of melasma

Sepideh Tehrani, Setareh Tehrani, Mitra Esmaili-Azad, Mahnaz Vaezi, Nazi Saljoughi

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

Background: Melasma is a brown or grayish brown symmetrical facial hyperpigmentation.A number of medicamens can be used for the treatment of this condition. For better results in treating melasma, combination therapy is preferred. The aim of this study was to determine the clinical efficacy and adverse effects of azelaic acid 20% plus hydroquinone 5% versus hydroquinone 5% alone in the management of melasma. Method: This study was performed as a double blind randomized clinical trial. We randomly prescribed two regimes including azelaic acid 20% cream plus hydroquinone 5% or hydroquinone 5% alone once daily for 4 months in 64 patients. Clinical efficacy (with MASI score) and side effects were assessed after one, two and four months of treatment. Result: MASI score reduction was from 9.35 to 2.9 in patients using azelaic acid 20% plus hydroquinone and from 9.58 to 4.02 in patients using hydroquinone 5%. Drug adverse effects, including burning (most frequent), itching, stinging, dryness and erythema, were present in 50% of the participants in the azelaic acid 20% plus hydroquinone group and 35% of the individuals in the hydroquinone 5% group (P= 0.034), but were tolerated by most patients. Conclusion: Both therapeutic regimens showed a remarkable efficacy in the treatment of melasma but azelaic acid 20% plus hydroquinone was more effective with a more rapid onset of therapeutic response. Azelaic acid 20% plus hydroquinone had more side effects although they were slight in most cases.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background: Melasma is a brown or grayish brown symmetrical facial hyperpigmentation.A number of medicamens can be used for the treatment of this condition. For better results in treating melasma, combination therapy is preferred. The aim of this study was to determine the clinical efficacy and adverse effects of azelaic acid 20% plus hydroquinone 5% versus hydroquinone 5% alone in the management of melasma. Method: This study was performed as a double blind randomized clinical trial. We randomly prescribed two regimes including azelaic acid 20% cream plus hydroquinone 5% or hydroquinone 5% alone once daily for 4 months in 64 patients. Clinical efficacy (with MASI score) and side effects were assessed after one, two and four months of treatment. Result: MASI score reduction was from 9.35 to 2.9 in patients using azelaic acid 20% plus hydroquinone and from 9.58 to 4.02 in patients using hydroquinone 5%. Drug adverse effects, including burning (most frequent), itching, stinging, dryness and erythema, were present in 50% of the participants in the azelaic acid 20% plus hydroquinone group and 35% of the individuals in the hydroquinone 5% group (P= 0.034), but were tolerated by most patients. Conclusion: Both therapeutic regimens showed a remarkable efficacy in the treatment of melasma but azelaic acid 20% plus hydroquinone was more effective with a more rapid onset of therapeutic response. Azelaic acid 20% plus hydroquinone had more side effects although they were slight in most cases.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background: Melasma is a brown or grayish brown symmetrical facial hyperpigmentation.A number of medicamens can be used for the treatment of this condition. For better results in treating melasma, combination therapy is preferred. The aim of this study was to determine the clinical efficacy and adverse effects of azelaic acid 20% plus hydroquinone 5% versus hydroquinone 5% alone in the management of melasma. Method: This study was performed as a double blind randomized clinical trial. We randomly prescribed two regimes including azelaic acid 20% cream plus hydroquinone 5% or hydroquinone 5% alone once daily for 4 months in 64 patients. Clinical efficacy (with MASI score) and side effects were assessed after one, two and four months of treatment. Result: MASI score reduction was from 9.35 to 2.9 in patients using azelaic acid 20% plus hydroquinone and from 9.58 to 4.02 in patients using hydroquinone 5%. Drug adverse effects, including burning (most frequent), itching, stinging, dryness and erythema, were present in 50% of the participants in the azelaic acid 20% plus hydroquinone group and 35% of the individuals in the hydroquinone 5% group (P= 0.034), but were tolerated by most patients. Conclusion: Both therapeutic regimens showed a remarkable efficacy in the treatment of melasma but azelaic acid 20% plus hydroquinone was more effective with a more rapid onset of therapeutic response. Azelaic acid 20% plus hydroquinone had more side effects although they were slight in most cases.

Key concepts: Melasma, Azelaic acid, Hydroquinone, Dermatology, Medicine, Adverse effect, Erythema, Hyperpigmentation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Efficacy and safety of azelaic acid 20% plus hydroquinone 5% in the management of melasma — Research Paper | ScholarLens