ScholarLens Back to search
2018•European TaxationRequires access

Opinion Statement ECJ-TF 2/2018 on the ECJ Decision of 7 September 2017 in Eqiom (Case C-6/16), concerning the Compatibility of the French Anti-Abuse Rule Regarding Outbound Dividends with the EU Parent-Subsidiary Directive (2011/96) and the Fundamental Freedoms

Alfredo García Prats, Werner Christof Haslehner, Volker Heydt, Eric C.C.M. Kemmeren, Georg Kofler, Michael Lang, Jürgen Lüdicke, João Félix Pinto Nogueira, Pasquale Pistone, Stella Raventós-Calvo, Emmanuel Raingeard de la Blétière, Isabelle Richelle, Alexander Rust, Rupert Shiers

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This record does not include an abstract. Use the full-text link above if available.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

An abstract is not available in the OpenAlex record for this paper.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Key concepts: Statement (logic), Dividend, Compatibility (geochemistry), Law, Political science, Engineering, Chemical engineering

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Opinion Statement ECJ-TF 2/2018 on the ECJ Decision of 7 September 2017 in Eqiom (Case C-6/16), concerning the Compatibility of the French Anti-Abuse Rule Regarding Outbound Dividends with the EU Parent-Subsidiary Directive (2011/96) and the Fundamental Freedoms — Research Paper | ScholarLens