2018•European TaxationRequires access

CFE - Opinion Statement ECJ-TF 2/2018 on the ECJ Decision of 7 September 2017 in Eqiom (Case C-6/16), Concerning the Compatibility of the French Anti-Abuse Rule Regarding Outbound Dividends with the EU Parent-Subsidiary Directive (2011/96) and the Fundamental Freedoms

Cfe Ecj Task Force

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This CFE Opinion Statement, submitted to the European Institutions in May 2018, addresses the ECJ’s decision in Eqiom (Case C-6/16), which concerns the EU law compatibility of the French anti-abuse rule regarding outbound dividends.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This CFE Opinion Statement, submitted to the European Institutions in May 2018, addresses the ECJ’s decision in Eqiom (Case C-6/16), which concerns the EU law compatibility of the French anti-abuse rule regarding outbound dividends.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This CFE Opinion Statement, submitted to the European Institutions in May 2018, addresses the ECJ’s decision in Eqiom (Case C-6/16), which concerns the EU law compatibility of the French anti-abuse rule regarding outbound dividends.

Key concepts: Statement (logic), Dividend, Compatibility (geochemistry), Law, Political science, Business, Engineering, Chemical engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
CFE - Opinion Statement ECJ-TF 2/2018 on the ECJ Decision of 7 September 2017 in Eqiom (Case C-6/16), Concerning the Compatibility of the French Anti-Abuse Rule Regarding Outbound Dividends with the EU Parent-Subsidiary Directive (2011/96) and the Fundamental Freedoms — Research Paper | ScholarLens