2017Unpublished venueRequires access

The Legislator's Intentions

Ulla V. Bondesen, Daniel Gläser

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Sociologists of law therefore encounter problems of interpretation when they attempt to determine the legislator&s;s intentions. First, it is often difficult to distinguish between theory and ideology. Second, even if the legislator bases his views on a treatment theory, he usually does not support his arguments with empirical data. Third, the legislator describes the system&s;s manifest functions and almost entirely neglects its latent functions. Fourth, the legislator proceeds almost exclusively from his own value system and fail to appraise the measures from the perspective of the person who will be subjected to treatment. Fifth, the legislator rarely undertakes a proper ends-means analysis. Sixth, legal language gives rise to certain problems. Finally, it is sometimes difficult to say who is the legislator and what weight should be given to legislative preparatory work, to doctrine and to practice. The legislator&s;s intentions have been successively watered down.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Sociologists of law therefore encounter problems of interpretation when they attempt to determine the legislator&s;s intentions. First, it is often difficult to distinguish between theory and ideology. Second, even if the legislator bases his views on a treatment theory, he usually does not support his arguments with empirical data. Third, the legislator describes the system&s;s manifest functions and almost entirely neglects its latent functions. Fourth, the legislator proceeds almost exclusively from his own value system and fail to appraise the measures from the perspective of the person who will be subjected to treatment. Fifth, the legislator rarely undertakes a proper ends-means analysis. Sixth, legal language gives rise to certain problems. Finally, it is sometimes difficult to say who is the legislator and what weight should be given to legislative preparatory work, to doctrine and to practice. The legislator&s;s intentions have been successively watered down.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Sociologists of law therefore encounter problems of interpretation when they attempt to determine the legislator&s;s intentions. First, it is often difficult to distinguish between theory and ideology. Second, even if the legislator bases his views on a treatment theory, he usually does not support his arguments with empirical data. Third, the legislator describes the system&s;s manifest functions and almost entirely neglects its latent functions. Fourth, the legislator proceeds almost exclusively from his own value system and fail to appraise the measures from the perspective of the person who will be subjected to treatment. Fifth, the legislator rarely undertakes a proper ends-means analysis. Sixth, legal language gives rise to certain problems. Finally, it is sometimes difficult to say who is the legislator and what weight should be given to legislative preparatory work, to doctrine and to practice. The legislator&s;s intentions have been successively watered down.

Key concepts: Legislator, Political science, Psychology, Business, Law, Legislation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Legislator's Intentions — Research Paper | ScholarLens