2017Unpublished venueRequires access

The Theory of Environmental Externalities

Jonathan M. Harris, Brian Roach

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

One of the core concepts of environmental economics is the theory of environmental externalities. Externalities can be either positive or negative. This chapter considers a form of economic theory called welfare analysis to show in more detail why it is socially preferable to internalize externalities. The idea of a Pigovian tax, which forces polluters to pay for the cost of their social and environmental damages, is intuitively appealing. Implicit in the imposition of a Pigovian tax is the idea that society has a legitimate right to be compensated for any pollution damages. According to the Coase Theorem, the clear assignment of property rights appears to promise efficient solutions to problems involving externalities. Under the principle of eminent domain, governments are permitted to appropriate private property for public purposes. However, the Fifth Amendment of the US Constitution requires that the property owner be fairly compensated.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

One of the core concepts of environmental economics is the theory of environmental externalities. Externalities can be either positive or negative. This chapter considers a form of economic theory called welfare analysis to show in more detail why it is socially preferable to internalize externalities. The idea of a Pigovian tax, which forces polluters to pay for the cost of their social and environmental damages, is intuitively appealing. Implicit in the imposition of a Pigovian tax is the idea that society has a legitimate right to be compensated for any pollution damages. According to the Coase Theorem, the clear assignment of property rights appears to promise efficient solutions to problems involving externalities. Under the principle of eminent domain, governments are permitted to appropriate private property for public purposes. However, the Fifth Amendment of the US Constitution requires that the property owner be fairly compensated.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

One of the core concepts of environmental economics is the theory of environmental externalities. Externalities can be either positive or negative. This chapter considers a form of economic theory called welfare analysis to show in more detail why it is socially preferable to internalize externalities. The idea of a Pigovian tax, which forces polluters to pay for the cost of their social and environmental damages, is intuitively appealing. Implicit in the imposition of a Pigovian tax is the idea that society has a legitimate right to be compensated for any pollution damages. According to the Coase Theorem, the clear assignment of property rights appears to promise efficient solutions to problems involving externalities. Under the principle of eminent domain, governments are permitted to appropriate private property for public purposes. However, the Fifth Amendment of the US Constitution requires that the property owner be fairly compensated.

Key concepts: Externality, Economics, Environmental science, Microeconomics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Theory of Environmental Externalities — Research Paper | ScholarLens