2017Unpublished venueRequires access

Bentham’s Utilitarianism

Louis Hartz

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Bentham defined the goal of the state broadly as that of maximizing happiness by erecting penalties to guide self-interest. Bentham then thought that the free society could only be implemented by a free state. Utilitarianism represented a broadening of the perspective of liberalism. The democratic state was a solution to the problem of establishing alternatives in a compulsory organization. The utilitarian formula for this impasse was to take the self-interest of the rulers, which appears as an absolute antithesis to the self-interest of the mass, and fuse the two by resolving them into a harmony. The utilitarian theory of representation still leaves with unresolved questions. The apparent affirmative social drift in Bentham&s;s outlook was multiplied by the definition of ways of attaining the utilitarian goal; subsistence, abundance, equality, and security were all to be provided by the state. The utilitarian mission in politics was not essentially constructive but a passive one.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Bentham defined the goal of the state broadly as that of maximizing happiness by erecting penalties to guide self-interest. Bentham then thought that the free society could only be implemented by a free state. Utilitarianism represented a broadening of the perspective of liberalism. The democratic state was a solution to the problem of establishing alternatives in a compulsory organization. The utilitarian formula for this impasse was to take the self-interest of the rulers, which appears as an absolute antithesis to the self-interest of the mass, and fuse the two by resolving them into a harmony. The utilitarian theory of representation still leaves with unresolved questions. The apparent affirmative social drift in Bentham&s;s outlook was multiplied by the definition of ways of attaining the utilitarian goal; subsistence, abundance, equality, and security were all to be provided by the state. The utilitarian mission in politics was not essentially constructive but a passive one.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Bentham defined the goal of the state broadly as that of maximizing happiness by erecting penalties to guide self-interest. Bentham then thought that the free society could only be implemented by a free state. Utilitarianism represented a broadening of the perspective of liberalism. The democratic state was a solution to the problem of establishing alternatives in a compulsory organization. The utilitarian formula for this impasse was to take the self-interest of the rulers, which appears as an absolute antithesis to the self-interest of the mass, and fuse the two by resolving them into a harmony. The utilitarian theory of representation still leaves with unresolved questions. The apparent affirmative social drift in Bentham&s;s outlook was multiplied by the definition of ways of attaining the utilitarian goal; subsistence, abundance, equality, and security were all to be provided by the state. The utilitarian mission in politics was not essentially constructive but a passive one.

Key concepts: Utilitarianism, Philosophy, Economics, Law and economics, Epistemology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Bentham’s Utilitarianism — Research Paper | ScholarLens