2017Unpublished venueRequires access

The dialectic of desire

David Lichtenstein

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The primal representation and interpretation of lack as constitutive of the human subject has implications for how we view language and desire, as well as the subject, in psychoanalysis. Object relations like all human subjectivity are formed discursively in an intersubjective encounter structured around the expression and interpretation of lack. That the lack in question is simple hunger does not stop the parent from giving it the significance of a social link, putting words to it, and treating the child&s;s expression of need, the cry, as an expression of longing and desire. Desire as the distinctly human experience rests upon the symbolic function, the representation of the missing thing, a function that not only structures its expression but is, indeed, the condition for that desire to come into being. Consider the clinical subject with the familiar subversive effects that are observed in psychoanalytic work: the forgetting, the slips, the misprisions.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The primal representation and interpretation of lack as constitutive of the human subject has implications for how we view language and desire, as well as the subject, in psychoanalysis. Object relations like all human subjectivity are formed discursively in an intersubjective encounter structured around the expression and interpretation of lack. That the lack in question is simple hunger does not stop the parent from giving it the significance of a social link, putting words to it, and treating the child&s;s expression of need, the cry, as an expression of longing and desire. Desire as the distinctly human experience rests upon the symbolic function, the representation of the missing thing, a function that not only structures its expression but is, indeed, the condition for that desire to come into being. Consider the clinical subject with the familiar subversive effects that are observed in psychoanalytic work: the forgetting, the slips, the misprisions.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The primal representation and interpretation of lack as constitutive of the human subject has implications for how we view language and desire, as well as the subject, in psychoanalysis. Object relations like all human subjectivity are formed discursively in an intersubjective encounter structured around the expression and interpretation of lack. That the lack in question is simple hunger does not stop the parent from giving it the significance of a social link, putting words to it, and treating the child&s;s expression of need, the cry, as an expression of longing and desire. Desire as the distinctly human experience rests upon the symbolic function, the representation of the missing thing, a function that not only structures its expression but is, indeed, the condition for that desire to come into being. Consider the clinical subject with the familiar subversive effects that are observed in psychoanalytic work: the forgetting, the slips, the misprisions.

Key concepts: Dialectic, Aesthetics, Psychology, Sociology, Psychoanalysis, Epistemology, Philosophy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The dialectic of desire — Research Paper | ScholarLens