2018Journal of Clinical OncologyRequires access

A multi-institution comparison of mitoxantrone, etoposide, and cytarabine (MEC) vs. high-dose cytarabine and mitoxantrone (Ara-C Couplets) therapy for patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia.

Sonia Christian, Pritesh Patel, Shawn P. Griffin, Vaibhav Agrawal, Irum Khan, Karen Sweiss, Ardaman Shergill, Heiko Konig, John G. Quigley

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

e19005 Background: R/R AML has a poor prognosis, thus salvage chemotherapy is used as a bridge to HSCT, however the optimal regimen remains unknown. MEC is commonly used as salvage; ~ 66% of patients achieve CR, with median survival 36 weeks (Arcese et al., JCO, 1991). As the Ara-Couplets regimen has a similar CR/CRi (55%; Larson et al., Leukemia & Lymphoma. 2012), we compared efficacy and toxicity of these regimens in a multi-institution retrospective analysis. Methods: We analyzed records of 43 patients (15 from UIC, 28 from IU) treated with MEC (mitoxantrone 8 mg/m2, etoposide 80 mg/m2 and cytarabine 1 g/m2 x 5 days) and 36 patients treated with Ara-C Couplets (mitoxantrone 30 mg/m2 daily and cytarabine 2 g/m2 twice daily, days 1 and 5) between 1998 and 2017 (n = 79). Results: Baseline characteristics including gender, race, Charlson Comorbidity Index and age were well balanced. Unfavorable cytogenetics were seen in 14 of MEC and 9 of the Couplets patients (p = ns). CR/CRi was achieved in 21 MEC and 20 Couplets patients (p = 0.65), OS was 196 days vs. 240 days respectively (p = 0.46), and PFS 156 days and 117.5 days respectively (p = 0.86). Seventeen MEC (17/43; 39.5%) and Couplets patients (17/36; 47%) went onto HSCT (p = 0.49). Median ANC recovery was 32 (MEC) and 40 days (Couplets; p = 0.37), while median platelet recovery was significantly different, at 36 and 55 days respectively (p = 0.04). Notably, Grade 3/4 GI toxicity occurred in 8 MEC (18.6%) and only one Couplets patient (2.4%; p = 0.03). In the Couplets group, 2/36 patients experienced cardiac toxicity (5.6%; CHF grades 3/4). The most common adverse event was febrile neutropenia (FN; 95% (MEC) and 86% respectively; p = 0.09). Conclusions: This is the first study directly comparing these salvage regimens in R/R AML; and using a racially diverse population of patients. While both are equally effective as a bridge to HSCT, MEC results in significantly more GI toxicities, and a higher incidence of FN, despite faster platelet recovery. Comparative studies in this population are rare, suggesting the need for larger studies to establish the optimal salvage chemotherapy regimen.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

e19005 Background: R/R AML has a poor prognosis, thus salvage chemotherapy is used as a bridge to HSCT, however the optimal regimen remains unknown. MEC is commonly used as salvage; ~ 66% of patients achieve CR, with median survival 36 weeks (Arcese et al., JCO, 1991). As the Ara-Couplets regimen has a similar CR/CRi (55%; Larson et al., Leukemia & Lymphoma. 2012), we compared efficacy and toxicity of these regimens in a multi-institution retrospective analysis. Methods: We analyzed records of 43 patients (15 from UIC, 28 from IU) treated with MEC (mitoxantrone 8 mg/m2, etoposide 80 mg/m2 and cytarabine 1 g/m2 x 5 days) and 36 patients treated with Ara-C Couplets (mitoxantrone 30 mg/m2 daily and cytarabine 2 g/m2 twice daily, days 1 and 5) between 1998 and 2017 (n = 79). Results: Baseline characteristics including gender, race, Charlson Comorbidity Index and age were well balanced. Unfavorable cytogenetics were seen in 14 of MEC and 9 of the Couplets patients (p = ns). CR/CRi was achieved in 21 MEC and 20 Couplets patients (p = 0.65), OS was 196 days vs. 240 days respectively (p = 0.46), and PFS 156 days and 117.5 days respectively (p = 0.86). Seventeen MEC (17/43; 39.5%) and Couplets patients (17/36; 47%) went onto HSCT (p = 0.49). Median ANC recovery was 32 (MEC) and 40 days (Couplets; p = 0.37), while median platelet recovery was significantly different, at 36 and 55 days respectively (p = 0.04). Notably, Grade 3/4 GI toxicity occurred in 8 MEC (18.6%) and only one Couplets patient (2.4%; p = 0.03). In the Couplets group, 2/36 patients experienced cardiac toxicity (5.6%; CHF grades 3/4). The most common adverse event was febrile neutropenia (FN; 95% (MEC) and 86% respectively; p = 0.09). Conclusions: This is the first study directly comparing these salvage regimens in R/R AML; and using a racially diverse population of patients. While both are equally effective as a bridge to HSCT, MEC results in significantly more GI toxicities, and a higher incidence of FN, despite faster platelet recovery. Comparative studies in this population are rare, suggesting the need for larger studies to establish the optimal salvage chemotherapy regimen.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

e19005 Background: R/R AML has a poor prognosis, thus salvage chemotherapy is used as a bridge to HSCT, however the optimal regimen remains unknown. MEC is commonly used as salvage; ~ 66% of patients achieve CR, with median survival 36 weeks (Arcese et al., JCO, 1991). As the Ara-Couplets regimen has a similar CR/CRi (55%; Larson et al., Leukemia & Lymphoma. 2012), we compared efficacy and toxicity of these regimens in a multi-institution retrospective analysis. Methods: We analyzed records of 43 patients (15 from UIC, 28 from IU) treated with MEC (mitoxantrone 8 mg/m2, etoposide 80 mg/m2 and cytarabine 1 g/m2 x 5 days) and 36 patients treated with Ara-C Couplets (mitoxantrone 30 mg/m2 daily and cytarabine 2 g/m2 twice daily, days 1 and 5) between 1998 and 2017 (n = 79). Results: Baseline characteristics including gender, race, Charlson Comorbidity Index and age were well balanced. Unfavorable cytogenetics were seen in 14 of MEC and 9 of the Couplets patients (p = ns). CR/CRi was achieved in 21 MEC and 20 Couplets patients (p = 0.65), OS was 196 days vs. 240 days respectively (p = 0.46), and PFS 156 days and 117.5 days respectively (p = 0.86). Seventeen MEC (17/43; 39.5%) and Couplets patients (17/36; 47%) went onto HSCT (p = 0.49). Median ANC recovery was 32 (MEC) and 40 days (Couplets; p = 0.37), while median platelet recovery was significantly different, at 36 and 55 days respectively (p = 0.04). Notably, Grade 3/4 GI toxicity occurred in 8 MEC (18.6%) and only one Couplets patient (2.4%; p = 0.03). In the Couplets group, 2/36 patients experienced cardiac toxicity (5.6%; CHF grades 3/4). The most common adverse event was febrile neutropenia (FN; 95% (MEC) and 86% respectively; p = 0.09). Conclusions: This is the first study directly comparing these salvage regimens in R/R AML; and using a racially diverse population of patients. While both are equally effective as a bridge to HSCT, MEC results in significantly more GI toxicities, and a higher incidence of FN, despite faster platelet recovery. Comparative studies in this population are rare, suggesting the need for larger studies to establish the optimal salvage chemotherapy regimen.

Key concepts: Mitoxantrone, Medicine, Cytarabine, Etoposide, Internal medicine, Gastroenterology, Regimen, Chemotherapy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A multi-institution comparison of mitoxantrone, etoposide, and cytarabine (MEC) vs. high-dose cytarabine and mitoxantrone (Ara-C Couplets) therapy for patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia. — Research Paper | ScholarLens