1995PubMedRequires access

[Response-oriented salvage chemotherapy with mitoxantrone, etoposide and enocitabine for previously treated acute myeloid leukemia. Tohoku Leukemia Study Group].

A Chubachi, S Kuriya, Y Narigasawa, K Meguro, Kazuya Endo, Hiroya Takami, S. SATO, H Sasaki, T. Shiga, Yukio Maruyama

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Twenty-two patients with previously treated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) received salvage chemotherapy with mitoxantrone, 5 mg/m2/d on days 1 to 3, etoposide, 70 mg/m2/d on days 1 to 5, and enocitabine, 170 mg/m2/d on days 1 to 7 (BHAC-ME). Additional mitoxantrone, etoposide (both for up to 2 days) and enocitabine (for up to 7 days) were given if the bone marrow obtained on day 8 was not severely hypoplastic. Mitoxantrone and etoposide had been previously administered in 14 and 15 patients, respectively. Seven patients had primary resistance; 14 patients had first relapse (4 early and 10 late): and 2 patients had second relapse. Overall, seven patients (31%) achieved a complete remission; 7/14 with first relapse, and 0/8 with primary resistance or second relapse. Four patients, 3 with primary resistance and 1 with first relapse, died of infectious complication in aplasia. First relapse patients who had been previously treated both with mitoxantrone and etoposide, had a lower CR rate than the other first relapse patients [2/8 (25%) vs 5/6 (86%)], although patient characteristics such as duration of first CR, initial karyotype, and performance status, were similar between the two groups. We conclude that response-oriented BHAC-ME regimen is still active in first relapse AML patients unless they have received both mitoxantrone and etoposide previously.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Twenty-two patients with previously treated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) received salvage chemotherapy with mitoxantrone, 5 mg/m2/d on days 1 to 3, etoposide, 70 mg/m2/d on days 1 to 5, and enocitabine, 170 mg/m2/d on days 1 to 7 (BHAC-ME). Additional mitoxantrone, etoposide (both for up to 2 days) and enocitabine (for up to 7 days) were given if the bone marrow obtained on day 8 was not severely hypoplastic. Mitoxantrone and etoposide had been previously administered in 14 and 15 patients, respectively. Seven patients had primary resistance; 14 patients had first relapse (4 early and 10 late): and 2 patients had second relapse. Overall, seven patients (31%) achieved a complete remission; 7/14 with first relapse, and 0/8 with primary resistance or second relapse. Four patients, 3 with primary resistance and 1 with first relapse, died of infectious complication in aplasia. First relapse patients who had been previously treated both with mitoxantrone and etoposide, had a lower CR rate than the other first relapse patients [2/8 (25%) vs 5/6 (86%)], although patient characteristics such as duration of first CR, initial karyotype, and performance status, were similar between the two groups. We conclude that response-oriented BHAC-ME regimen is still active in first relapse AML patients unless they have received both mitoxantrone and etoposide previously.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Twenty-two patients with previously treated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) received salvage chemotherapy with mitoxantrone, 5 mg/m2/d on days 1 to 3, etoposide, 70 mg/m2/d on days 1 to 5, and enocitabine, 170 mg/m2/d on days 1 to 7 (BHAC-ME). Additional mitoxantrone, etoposide (both for up to 2 days) and enocitabine (for up to 7 days) were given if the bone marrow obtained on day 8 was not severely hypoplastic. Mitoxantrone and etoposide had been previously administered in 14 and 15 patients, respectively. Seven patients had primary resistance; 14 patients had first relapse (4 early and 10 late): and 2 patients had second relapse. Overall, seven patients (31%) achieved a complete remission; 7/14 with first relapse, and 0/8 with primary resistance or second relapse. Four patients, 3 with primary resistance and 1 with first relapse, died of infectious complication in aplasia. First relapse patients who had been previously treated both with mitoxantrone and etoposide, had a lower CR rate than the other first relapse patients [2/8 (25%) vs 5/6 (86%)], although patient characteristics such as duration of first CR, initial karyotype, and performance status, were similar between the two groups. We conclude that response-oriented BHAC-ME regimen is still active in first relapse AML patients unless they have received both mitoxantrone and etoposide previously.

Key concepts: Mitoxantrone, Etoposide, Medicine, Myeloid leukemia, Internal medicine, Chemotherapy, Salvage therapy, Cytarabine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Response-oriented salvage chemotherapy with mitoxantrone, etoposide and enocitabine for previously treated acute myeloid leukemia. Tohoku Leukemia Study Group]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens