2018•Journal of Antimicrobial ChemotherapyOpen access
Distribution of plasma concentrations of first-line anti-TB drugs and individual MICs: a prospective cohort study in a low endemic setting
Katarina Niward, Lina Davies Forsman, Judith Bruchfeld, Erja Chryssanthou, Oskar Carlström, Teba Alomari, Björn Carlsson, Anton Pohanka, Mikael Mansjö, Michaela Jonsson Nordvall, Anders Johansson, Erik Eliasson, Jim Werngren, Jakob Paues, Ulrika S. H. Simonsson, Thomas Schön
Abstract
Background: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) could improve current TB treatment, but few studies have reported pharmacokinetic data together with MICs. Objectives: To investigate plasma concentrations of rifampicin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide and ethambutol along with MICs. Methods: Drug concentrations of rifampicin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide and ethambutol were analysed pre-dose and 2, 4 and 6 h after drug intake at week 2 in 31 TB patients and MICs in BACTEC 960 MGIT were determined at baseline. The highest plasma concentrations at 2, 4 and 6 h post-dose (Chigh) were determined, as well as estimates of Chigh/MIC and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0-6)/MIC including the corresponding ratios based on calculated free-drug concentrations. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02042261). Results: After 2 weeks of treatment, the median Chigh values for rifampicin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide and ethambutol were 10.0, 5.3, 41.1 and 3.3 mg/L respectively. Lower than recommended drug concentrations were detected in 42% of the patients for rifampicin (<8 mg/L), 19% for isoniazid (<3 mg/L), 27% for pyrazinamide (<35 mg/L) and 16% for ethambutol (<2 mg/L). The median Chigh/MIC values for rifampicin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide and ethambutol were 164, 128, 1.3 and 2.5, respectively, whereas the AUC0-6/MIC was 636 (range 156-2759) for rifampicin and 351 (range 72-895) for isoniazid. Conclusions: We report low levels of first-line TB drugs in 16%-42% of patients, in particular for rifampicin. There was a wide distribution of the ratios between drug exposures and MICs. The future use of MIC determinations in TDM is dependent on the development of a reference method and clinically validated pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets.