Achievement and at-Risk Middle School Students’ Perspectives of Academic Support
Elisha A. Chambers, Michael Hylen, James B. Schreiber
Abstract
Elisha A. Chambers, Michael Hylen, James B. Schreiber
Abstract
Schools are implementing approaches such as character education, to improve school climate and student time-on-task and, consequently, achievement. In keeping with the Character Education Partnership (2003) principles, this research examined how at-risk middle school students’ (n = 7,813) perspectives of academic support influenced their academic achievement. The results revealed that the more parent and peer support a student received, the higher the general achievement score; however, the more counselor support received the lower the general achievement score. Teacher support was only statistically significant for the lowest risk group. While the parent (Berkowitz, 1998; Berkowitz & Bier, 2006) and peer (Horn & Chen, 1998; Westfall & Pisapia, 1994) findings are consistent with previous research, the teacher and counselor finding are somewhat surprising with a 25-year history noting the importance of support in schools; thus, further investigation is warranted.
OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Schools are implementing approaches such as character education, to improve school climate and student time-on-task and, consequently, achievement. In keeping with the Character Education Partnership (2003) principles, this research examined how at-risk middle school students’ (n = 7,813) perspectives of academic support influenced their academic achievement. The results revealed that the more parent and peer support a student received, the higher the general achievement score; however, the more counselor support received the lower the general achievement score. Teacher support was only statistically significant for the lowest risk group. While the parent (Berkowitz, 1998; Berkowitz & Bier, 2006) and peer (Horn & Chen, 1998; Westfall & Pisapia, 1994) findings are consistent with previous research, the teacher and counselor finding are somewhat surprising with a 25-year history noting the importance of support in schools; thus, further investigation is warranted.
Key concepts: Mathematics education, Academic achievement, At-risk students, Pedagogy, Psychology