Evaluation of Non-Fermented Dough from Wheat/Barley/Hemp Composites
M. Hrušková, Ivan Švec
Abstract
M. Hrušková, Ivan Švec
Abstract
Abstract Basic wheat-barley flour premixes (70 : 30 and 50 : 50) were enhanced by 5 and 10% of dehulled and hulled hemp seeds wholemeal or by 2 types of hemp fine flour. Barley flour (BF) decreased both protein content and quality by approximately 1.5 and 50%, respectively. In blends, hemp fine flour containing recovered protein level back. BF lowered amylases activity by about 20–25% in maximum; hemp products had no significant effect. Farinograph water absorption was magnified by additions of both alternative flours. Considerable shortening of dough stability and decrease of resistance against over-mixing occurred for all flour tri-composites. Extensigraph dough elasticity increased and extensibility diminished. After dough resting taking 30 min, extensigraph energy of the control sample fell from 141 cm 2 to a half as barley flour portion increased. In cereal composites, hemp products demonstrated reversal tendencies. BF lowered water suspension viscosity, but hemp wholemeal H4 and especially fine hemp flour H7 caused a recovery of amylograph maxima to level comparable with wheat control. Correlation analysis confirmed analytical and rheological data agreement – the extensigraph elasticity or energy could be predicted according to the Zeleny value, or the amylograph maximum according to the Falling Number ( r = 0.79, 0.90, and 0.65, respectively; P = 99.9%).
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract Basic wheat-barley flour premixes (70 : 30 and 50 : 50) were enhanced by 5 and 10% of dehulled and hulled hemp seeds wholemeal or by 2 types of hemp fine flour. Barley flour (BF) decreased both protein content and quality by approximately 1.5 and 50%, respectively. In blends, hemp fine flour containing recovered protein level back. BF lowered amylases activity by about 20–25% in maximum; hemp products had no significant effect. Farinograph water absorption was magnified by additions of both alternative flours. Considerable shortening of dough stability and decrease of resistance against over-mixing occurred for all flour tri-composites. Extensigraph dough elasticity increased and extensibility diminished. After dough resting taking 30 min, extensigraph energy of the control sample fell from 141 cm 2 to a half as barley flour portion increased. In cereal composites, hemp products demonstrated reversal tendencies. BF lowered water suspension viscosity, but hemp wholemeal H4 and especially fine hemp flour H7 caused a recovery of amylograph maxima to level comparable with wheat control. Correlation analysis confirmed analytical and rheological data agreement – the extensigraph elasticity or energy could be predicted according to the Zeleny value, or the amylograph maximum according to the Falling Number ( r = 0.79, 0.90, and 0.65, respectively; P = 99.9%).
Key concepts: Farinograph, Falling Number, Wheat flour, Food science, Absorption of water, Rheology, Barley flour, Mathematics