2018•Clinical Journal of Sport MedicineRequires access

Enhanced External Counterpulsation and Recovery From a Plyometric Exercise Bout

Pedro L. Valenzuela, Zigor Montalvo, Elaia Torrontegi, Guillermo Sánchez‐Martínez, Alejandro Lucía, Pedro de la Villa

Open publisher page 12 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effectiveness of enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) on recovery from exercise-induced muscle damage (EIMD). DESIGN: This study followed a crossover, placebo-controlled, counterbalanced design. PARTICIPANTS: Ten healthy active subjects (7 male; 27 ± 4 years). INTERVENTIONS: Participants performed a plyometric exercise bout (10 sets of 10 jumps interspersed with 1-minute rests) and were then assigned to recover for 30 minutes with either EECP (cuff pressure = 80 mm Hg) or a Sham intervention (0 mm Hg) immediately after exercise and at 24 hours after exercise. Two weeks later, they repeated the protocol with the other recovery intervention. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Muscle soreness, creatine kinase (CK) activity, jump performance, and tensiomyographic variables were measured before exercise, and 24 and 48 hours after exercise. RESULTS: The mean jump height of the plyometric bout did not differ between EECP and Sham (P > 0.05). Exercise resulted in increased muscle soreness (P < 0.001) and CK levels (P < 0.001), as well as in impaired jump performance (P < 0.05). No changes were observed in tensiomyographic variables. No significant differences were found between interventions for any of the study outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: No benefits on recovery from EIMD after a plyometric exercise bout were observed with EECP.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effectiveness of enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) on recovery from exercise-induced muscle damage (EIMD). DESIGN: This study followed a crossover, placebo-controlled, counterbalanced design. PARTICIPANTS: Ten healthy active subjects (7 male; 27 ± 4 years). INTERVENTIONS: Participants performed a plyometric exercise bout (10 sets of 10 jumps interspersed with 1-minute rests) and were then assigned to recover for 30 minutes with either EECP (cuff pressure = 80 mm Hg) or a Sham intervention (0 mm Hg) immediately after exercise and at 24 hours after exercise. Two weeks later, they repeated the protocol with the other recovery intervention. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Muscle soreness, creatine kinase (CK) activity, jump performance, and tensiomyographic variables were measured before exercise, and 24 and 48 hours after exercise. RESULTS: The mean jump height of the plyometric bout did not differ between EECP and Sham (P > 0.05). Exercise resulted in increased muscle soreness (P < 0.001) and CK levels (P < 0.001), as well as in impaired jump performance (P < 0.05). No changes were observed in tensiomyographic variables. No significant differences were found between interventions for any of the study outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: No benefits on recovery from EIMD after a plyometric exercise bout were observed with EECP.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effectiveness of enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) on recovery from exercise-induced muscle damage (EIMD). DESIGN: This study followed a crossover, placebo-controlled, counterbalanced design. PARTICIPANTS: Ten healthy active subjects (7 male; 27 ± 4 years). INTERVENTIONS: Participants performed a plyometric exercise bout (10 sets of 10 jumps interspersed with 1-minute rests) and were then assigned to recover for 30 minutes with either EECP (cuff pressure = 80 mm Hg) or a Sham intervention (0 mm Hg) immediately after exercise and at 24 hours after exercise. Two weeks later, they repeated the protocol with the other recovery intervention. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Muscle soreness, creatine kinase (CK) activity, jump performance, and tensiomyographic variables were measured before exercise, and 24 and 48 hours after exercise. RESULTS: The mean jump height of the plyometric bout did not differ between EECP and Sham (P > 0.05). Exercise resulted in increased muscle soreness (P < 0.001) and CK levels (P < 0.001), as well as in impaired jump performance (P < 0.05). No changes were observed in tensiomyographic variables. No significant differences were found between interventions for any of the study outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: No benefits on recovery from EIMD after a plyometric exercise bout were observed with EECP.

Key concepts: Medicine, Plyometrics, Physical therapy, Crossover study, Creatine kinase, Placebo, Muscle damage, Cardiology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Enhanced External Counterpulsation and Recovery From a Plyometric Exercise Bout — Research Paper | ScholarLens