2013•Unpublished venueRequires access

Comparative Study of Inducible and Constitutive Clindamycin Resistance among Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus AureusIsolates.

V Aruna

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

INTRODUCTION : Staphylococcus aureus is the commonly encountered pathogen isolated from clinical specimens. Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)causes variety of human infections resulting in high rate of mortality and morbidity.Clindamycin, lincosamide antibiotic is a good option for clinicians to treat MRSA infections. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES : The aim of the study was to screen for MRSA by disc diffusion method with cefoxitin and oxacillin discs and to determine the prevalence of inducible clindamycin resistance and constitutive clindamycin resistance in MRSA and compare them. MATERIALS AND METHODS : 200 staphylococcus aureus were isolated from samples like pus, blood, sputum, vaginal swab, urine and body fluids received in microbiology department of Coimbatore Medical College Hospital.They were confirmed by microscopy,culture and biochemical reaction. Then MRSA were detected by disc diffusion test using Cefoxitin (30μg) and Oxacillin(1μg) discs. Clindamycin resistance were detected by performing D-test by placing erythromycin 15μg and clindamycin 2μg discs at 15-20mm interdisc distance. RESULTS : Majority of staphylococcus aureus were isolated from pus samples (87.5%). Staphylococcus aureus was highly sensitive to linezolid (100%) and vancomycin (99%) and 100% resistant to penicillin. Cefoxitin disc detected higher percentage (26%) of MRSA than oxacillin disc (24%). Analysis of clindamycin resistance in 52 (26%) MRSA isolates showed 42.30% of inducible clindamycin resistance, 30.76 % of constitutive clindamycin resistance and 26.92% were sensitive to both erythromycin and clindamycin. CONCLUSION : Detection of MRSA is very important for treating patients and to prevent its spread. MRSA isolates exhibiting inducible clindamycin resistance are seemed to be susceptible to clindamycin in vitro but resistant invivo resulting in treatment failure. So‘D’test is suggested along with routine antibiotic susceptibility testing to detect inducible clindamycin resistance.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

INTRODUCTION : Staphylococcus aureus is the commonly encountered pathogen isolated from clinical specimens. Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)causes variety of human infections resulting in high rate of mortality and morbidity.Clindamycin, lincosamide antibiotic is a good option for clinicians to treat MRSA infections. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES : The aim of the study was to screen for MRSA by disc diffusion method with cefoxitin and oxacillin discs and to determine the prevalence of inducible clindamycin resistance and constitutive clindamycin resistance in MRSA and compare them. MATERIALS AND METHODS : 200 staphylococcus aureus were isolated from samples like pus, blood, sputum, vaginal swab, urine and body fluids received in microbiology department of Coimbatore Medical College Hospital.They were confirmed by microscopy,culture and biochemical reaction. Then MRSA were detected by disc diffusion test using Cefoxitin (30μg) and Oxacillin(1μg) discs. Clindamycin resistance were detected by performing D-test by placing erythromycin 15μg and clindamycin 2μg discs at 15-20mm interdisc distance. RESULTS : Majority of staphylococcus aureus were isolated from pus samples (87.5%). Staphylococcus aureus was highly sensitive to linezolid (100%) and vancomycin (99%) and 100% resistant to penicillin. Cefoxitin disc detected higher percentage (26%) of MRSA than oxacillin disc (24%). Analysis of clindamycin resistance in 52 (26%) MRSA isolates showed 42.30% of inducible clindamycin resistance, 30.76 % of constitutive clindamycin resistance and 26.92% were sensitive to both erythromycin and clindamycin. CONCLUSION : Detection of MRSA is very important for treating patients and to prevent its spread. MRSA isolates exhibiting inducible clindamycin resistance are seemed to be susceptible to clindamycin in vitro but resistant invivo resulting in treatment failure. So‘D’test is suggested along with routine antibiotic susceptibility testing to detect inducible clindamycin resistance.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

INTRODUCTION : Staphylococcus aureus is the commonly encountered pathogen isolated from clinical specimens. Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)causes variety of human infections resulting in high rate of mortality and morbidity.Clindamycin, lincosamide antibiotic is a good option for clinicians to treat MRSA infections. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES : The aim of the study was to screen for MRSA by disc diffusion method with cefoxitin and oxacillin discs and to determine the prevalence of inducible clindamycin resistance and constitutive clindamycin resistance in MRSA and compare them. MATERIALS AND METHODS : 200 staphylococcus aureus were isolated from samples like pus, blood, sputum, vaginal swab, urine and body fluids received in microbiology department of Coimbatore Medical College Hospital.They were confirmed by microscopy,culture and biochemical reaction. Then MRSA were detected by disc diffusion test using Cefoxitin (30μg) and Oxacillin(1μg) discs. Clindamycin resistance were detected by performing D-test by placing erythromycin 15μg and clindamycin 2μg discs at 15-20mm interdisc distance. RESULTS : Majority of staphylococcus aureus were isolated from pus samples (87.5%). Staphylococcus aureus was highly sensitive to linezolid (100%) and vancomycin (99%) and 100% resistant to penicillin. Cefoxitin disc detected higher percentage (26%) of MRSA than oxacillin disc (24%). Analysis of clindamycin resistance in 52 (26%) MRSA isolates showed 42.30% of inducible clindamycin resistance, 30.76 % of constitutive clindamycin resistance and 26.92% were sensitive to both erythromycin and clindamycin. CONCLUSION : Detection of MRSA is very important for treating patients and to prevent its spread. MRSA isolates exhibiting inducible clindamycin resistance are seemed to be susceptible to clindamycin in vitro but resistant invivo resulting in treatment failure. So‘D’test is suggested along with routine antibiotic susceptibility testing to detect inducible clindamycin resistance.

Key concepts: Clindamycin, Cefoxitin, Staphylococcus aureus, Microbiology, Erythromycin, Vancomycin, Medicine, Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative Study of Inducible and Constitutive Clindamycin Resistance among Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus AureusIsolates. — Research Paper | ScholarLens