2018Cogent PsychologyOpen access

Driving slow motorised vehicles with visual impairment—A simulator study

Christina Cordes, Joost Heutink, Karel Brookhuis, Wiebo Brouwer, Bart Melis-Dankers

Open full text 18 citations

Abstract

Purpose: To compare different driving parameters between visually impaired people and normal sighted controls in a mobility scooter and microcar driving simulator.Materials and methods: A mobility scooter and microcar driving simulator and different virtual environments were developed for the purpose of this experiment. Participants completed 4 drives in the microcar driving simulator and 8 drives in the mobility scooter driving simulator. Driving performance was compared between visually impaired and normal sighted participants, using the parameters speed, lateral position, time-to-collision, and number and type of collision.Results: Visually impaired participants did not differ significantly from normal sighted controls with regard to speed and overall lateral position. In contrast, number of collisions was higher in visually impaired participants in almost all drives. Time-to-collision differed in some, but not all of the drives. Small obstacles with low contrast posed the highest risk of collision for impaired drivers.Conclusions: The present findings showed that visually impaired participants were able to maintain a steady position on the street, but showed more difficulties in traffic situations that included obstacles and other traffic participants. Familiarity with the driving tasks seemed to improve performance, however, further research is necessary to confirm this observation.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Purpose: To compare different driving parameters between visually impaired people and normal sighted controls in a mobility scooter and microcar driving simulator.Materials and methods: A mobility scooter and microcar driving simulator and different virtual environments were developed for the purpose of this experiment. Participants completed 4 drives in the microcar driving simulator and 8 drives in the mobility scooter driving simulator. Driving performance was compared between visually impaired and normal sighted participants, using the parameters speed, lateral position, time-to-collision, and number and type of collision.Results: Visually impaired participants did not differ significantly from normal sighted controls with regard to speed and overall lateral position. In contrast, number of collisions was higher in visually impaired participants in almost all drives. Time-to-collision differed in some, but not all of the drives. Small obstacles with low contrast posed the highest risk of collision for impaired drivers.Conclusions: The present findings showed that visually impaired participants were able to maintain a steady position on the street, but showed more difficulties in traffic situations that included obstacles and other traffic participants. Familiarity with the driving tasks seemed to improve performance, however, further research is necessary to confirm this observation.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 18 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Purpose: To compare different driving parameters between visually impaired people and normal sighted controls in a mobility scooter and microcar driving simulator.Materials and methods: A mobility scooter and microcar driving simulator and different virtual environments were developed for the purpose of this experiment. Participants completed 4 drives in the microcar driving simulator and 8 drives in the mobility scooter driving simulator. Driving performance was compared between visually impaired and normal sighted participants, using the parameters speed, lateral position, time-to-collision, and number and type of collision.Results: Visually impaired participants did not differ significantly from normal sighted controls with regard to speed and overall lateral position. In contrast, number of collisions was higher in visually impaired participants in almost all drives. Time-to-collision differed in some, but not all of the drives. Small obstacles with low contrast posed the highest risk of collision for impaired drivers.Conclusions: The present findings showed that visually impaired participants were able to maintain a steady position on the street, but showed more difficulties in traffic situations that included obstacles and other traffic participants. Familiarity with the driving tasks seemed to improve performance, however, further research is necessary to confirm this observation.

Key concepts: Driving simulator, Driving simulation, Simulation, Collision, Psychology, Simulator sickness, Visually impaired, Contrast (vision)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Driving slow motorised vehicles with visual impairment—A simulator study — Research Paper | ScholarLens