1941•Michigan Law ReviewRequires access

Criminal Law and Procedure: Voluntary Communication to Grand Jury as Contempt

James K. Lindsay

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Defendant wrote two letters to the grand jury, then in session, asking leave to appear before it to present evidence of a conspiracy, described therein in highly inflammatory language, between a newspaper, the county assessor and the state's attorney to defraud the state of many millions of revenue by the illegal omission of the newspaper's personal property from the county tax rolls. The state's attorney filed an information incorporating these letters. The trial court found that defendant was guilty of criminal contempt. On appeal, defendant contended that this conviction deprived him of his constitutional right of free speech. Held, the letters constitute contempt of court as an unauthorized interference with the administration of justice, even though the letters do not refer to cases pending before the grand jury. People v. Parker, 374 Ill. 524, 30 N. E. (2d) 11 (1940),1 cert. den. 313 U.S. 560, 61 S. Ct. 836 (1941).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Defendant wrote two letters to the grand jury, then in session, asking leave to appear before it to present evidence of a conspiracy, described therein in highly inflammatory language, between a newspaper, the county assessor and the state's attorney to defraud the state of many millions of revenue by the illegal omission of the newspaper's personal property from the county tax rolls. The state's attorney filed an information incorporating these letters. The trial court found that defendant was guilty of criminal contempt. On appeal, defendant contended that this conviction deprived him of his constitutional right of free speech. Held, the letters constitute contempt of court as an unauthorized interference with the administration of justice, even though the letters do not refer to cases pending before the grand jury. People v. Parker, 374 Ill. 524, 30 N. E. (2d) 11 (1940),1 cert. den. 313 U.S. 560, 61 S. Ct. 836 (1941).

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Defendant wrote two letters to the grand jury, then in session, asking leave to appear before it to present evidence of a conspiracy, described therein in highly inflammatory language, between a newspaper, the county assessor and the state's attorney to defraud the state of many millions of revenue by the illegal omission of the newspaper's personal property from the county tax rolls. The state's attorney filed an information incorporating these letters. The trial court found that defendant was guilty of criminal contempt. On appeal, defendant contended that this conviction deprived him of his constitutional right of free speech. Held, the letters constitute contempt of court as an unauthorized interference with the administration of justice, even though the letters do not refer to cases pending before the grand jury. People v. Parker, 374 Ill. 524, 30 N. E. (2d) 11 (1940),1 cert. den. 313 U.S. 560, 61 S. Ct. 836 (1941).

Key concepts: Contempt, Law, Criminal law, Criminal procedure, Political science, Jury, Criminology, Psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Criminal Law and Procedure: Voluntary Communication to Grand Jury as Contempt — Research Paper | ScholarLens