Incentive compatible designs for FIFA and UEFA tournament qualifiers
Łászló Csató
Abstract
Łászló Csató
Abstract
Tournament organisers supposedly design rules such that a team cannot be better off by exerting a lower effort. It is shown that the European qualifiers to the 2018 FIFA World Cup do not satisfy this requirement: a team might be eliminated if it wins its last match in the group stage, while it advances to the next qualification round by playing a draw, provided that all other results remain the same. We present a theoretical model and identify nine incentive incompatible qualifiers to the recent FIFA World Cups and UEFA European Championships. Two mechanisms are suggested in order to prevent manipulation in similar group-based qualification systems where teams from different groups should be compared in a repechage. The first is based on abolishing the anonymity of the matches discarded in the repechage, while the second involves a rethinking of the seeding procedure.
OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Tournament organisers supposedly design rules such that a team cannot be better off by exerting a lower effort. It is shown that the European qualifiers to the 2018 FIFA World Cup do not satisfy this requirement: a team might be eliminated if it wins its last match in the group stage, while it advances to the next qualification round by playing a draw, provided that all other results remain the same. We present a theoretical model and identify nine incentive incompatible qualifiers to the recent FIFA World Cups and UEFA European Championships. Two mechanisms are suggested in order to prevent manipulation in similar group-based qualification systems where teams from different groups should be compared in a repechage. The first is based on abolishing the anonymity of the matches discarded in the repechage, while the second involves a rethinking of the seeding procedure.
Key concepts: Tournament, Anonymity, Incentive, Order (exchange), Advertising, Marketing, Incentive compatibility, Business