1942Michigan Law ReviewRequires access

Labor Law: National Labor Relations Board: Conflicting Jurisdictional Areas of National and State Labor Boards

Harry M. Nayer

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The!! National Labor Relations Board proceeded against defendant corporation, which was admittedly engaged in interstate commerce and subject to the National Labor Relations Act, to enforce its order enjoining the use of unfair labor practices and compelling the reinstatement of employees discharged because of union activities. Defendant attacked the board's jurisdiction on the ground that prior to the board's proceeding, the Wisconsin Labor Relations Board, acting under the Wisconsin labor law, had assumed jurisdiction of the case and had disposed of it, thus precluding subsequent action by the National Labor Relations Board. Held, the N. L. R. B. is not prevented from assuming jurisdiction, since there is no record of any formal proceedings or of an ultimate disposition of the case by the Wisconsin board. National Lahar Relations Board v. Algoma Net Co., (C. C. A. 7th, 1941) 124 F. (2d) 730.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The!! National Labor Relations Board proceeded against defendant corporation, which was admittedly engaged in interstate commerce and subject to the National Labor Relations Act, to enforce its order enjoining the use of unfair labor practices and compelling the reinstatement of employees discharged because of union activities. Defendant attacked the board's jurisdiction on the ground that prior to the board's proceeding, the Wisconsin Labor Relations Board, acting under the Wisconsin labor law, had assumed jurisdiction of the case and had disposed of it, thus precluding subsequent action by the National Labor Relations Board. Held, the N. L. R. B. is not prevented from assuming jurisdiction, since there is no record of any formal proceedings or of an ultimate disposition of the case by the Wisconsin board. National Lahar Relations Board v. Algoma Net Co., (C. C. A. 7th, 1941) 124 F. (2d) 730.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The!! National Labor Relations Board proceeded against defendant corporation, which was admittedly engaged in interstate commerce and subject to the National Labor Relations Act, to enforce its order enjoining the use of unfair labor practices and compelling the reinstatement of employees discharged because of union activities. Defendant attacked the board's jurisdiction on the ground that prior to the board's proceeding, the Wisconsin Labor Relations Board, acting under the Wisconsin labor law, had assumed jurisdiction of the case and had disposed of it, thus precluding subsequent action by the National Labor Relations Board. Held, the N. L. R. B. is not prevented from assuming jurisdiction, since there is no record of any formal proceedings or of an ultimate disposition of the case by the Wisconsin board. National Lahar Relations Board v. Algoma Net Co., (C. C. A. 7th, 1941) 124 F. (2d) 730.

Key concepts: Labor relations, United States labor law, Labour law, Industrial relations, Labour economics, State (computer science), Labor disputes, The labor problem

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Labor Law: National Labor Relations Board: Conflicting Jurisdictional Areas of National and State Labor Boards — Research Paper | ScholarLens