Fiduciary Doctrine: A Concept in Need of Understanding
Leonard I. Rotman
Abstract
Open-access reader
Leonard I. Rotman
Abstract
Open-access reader
The author suggests that one of the primary problems plaguing the application of fiduciary doctrine in contemporary jurisprudence is the failure to appreciate its contextual nature and underlying purpose. The contextual analysis and rigid application of standard formulae by the judiciary is harmful to the understanding of fiduciary doctrine, which requires that due attention be paid to the unique requirements of particular relationships. The history of fiduciary jurisprudence reveals that more confusion than knowledge currently exists in this area of the law. What is needed is a return to the fundamental elements of fiduciary doctrine so that its more precise application in accordance with its underlying purpose and situation-specific nature becomes possible.
OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The author suggests that one of the primary problems plaguing the application of fiduciary doctrine in contemporary jurisprudence is the failure to appreciate its contextual nature and underlying purpose. The contextual analysis and rigid application of standard formulae by the judiciary is harmful to the understanding of fiduciary doctrine, which requires that due attention be paid to the unique requirements of particular relationships. The history of fiduciary jurisprudence reveals that more confusion than knowledge currently exists in this area of the law. What is needed is a return to the fundamental elements of fiduciary doctrine so that its more precise application in accordance with its underlying purpose and situation-specific nature becomes possible.
Key concepts: Fiduciary, Doctrine, Jurisprudence, Confusion, Law and economics, Law, Political science, Legal doctrine