1996•Alberta Law ReviewOpen access

Fiduciary Doctrine: A Concept in Need of Understanding

Leonard I. Rotman

Open full text 8 citations

Abstract

The author suggests that one of the primary problems plaguing the application of fiduciary doctrine in contemporary jurisprudence is the failure to appreciate its contextual nature and underlying purpose. The contextual analysis and rigid application of standard formulae by the judiciary is harmful to the understanding of fiduciary doctrine, which requires that due attention be paid to the unique requirements of particular relationships. The history of fiduciary jurisprudence reveals that more confusion than knowledge currently exists in this area of the law. What is needed is a return to the fundamental elements of fiduciary doctrine so that its more precise application in accordance with its underlying purpose and situation-specific nature becomes possible.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The author suggests that one of the primary problems plaguing the application of fiduciary doctrine in contemporary jurisprudence is the failure to appreciate its contextual nature and underlying purpose. The contextual analysis and rigid application of standard formulae by the judiciary is harmful to the understanding of fiduciary doctrine, which requires that due attention be paid to the unique requirements of particular relationships. The history of fiduciary jurisprudence reveals that more confusion than knowledge currently exists in this area of the law. What is needed is a return to the fundamental elements of fiduciary doctrine so that its more precise application in accordance with its underlying purpose and situation-specific nature becomes possible.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The author suggests that one of the primary problems plaguing the application of fiduciary doctrine in contemporary jurisprudence is the failure to appreciate its contextual nature and underlying purpose. The contextual analysis and rigid application of standard formulae by the judiciary is harmful to the understanding of fiduciary doctrine, which requires that due attention be paid to the unique requirements of particular relationships. The history of fiduciary jurisprudence reveals that more confusion than knowledge currently exists in this area of the law. What is needed is a return to the fundamental elements of fiduciary doctrine so that its more precise application in accordance with its underlying purpose and situation-specific nature becomes possible.

Key concepts: Fiduciary, Doctrine, Jurisprudence, Confusion, Law and economics, Law, Political science, Legal doctrine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Fiduciary Doctrine: A Concept in Need of Understanding — Research Paper | ScholarLens