2016SSRN Electronic JournalOpen access

Atmospheric Trust Litigation Across the World

Mary Christina Wood

Open full text 6 citations

Abstract

This chapter examines the nature of fiduciary duties in Australia and the direction the High Court of Australia has been taking in relation to fiduciary theory. It focuses on whether climate change fiduciary duties are possible under Australian general law. The chapter reviews the types of fiduciary duties that could be recognised in light of the High Court's more recent statements on the fiduciary principle. The fiduciary principle has not traditionally been limited to the conflicts and profits rules. For example, company directors have for many years been subject to additional fiduciary duties. A number of commentators and judges have expressed the view that Australian fiduciary duties are now limited to the conflicts and profits rules. The use of the fiduciary model to impose positive duties to protect the environment and prevent climate change is likely to be difficult in Australia due to the High Court's recent statements on fiduciary theory.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter examines the nature of fiduciary duties in Australia and the direction the High Court of Australia has been taking in relation to fiduciary theory. It focuses on whether climate change fiduciary duties are possible under Australian general law. The chapter reviews the types of fiduciary duties that could be recognised in light of the High Court's more recent statements on the fiduciary principle. The fiduciary principle has not traditionally been limited to the conflicts and profits rules. For example, company directors have for many years been subject to additional fiduciary duties. A number of commentators and judges have expressed the view that Australian fiduciary duties are now limited to the conflicts and profits rules. The use of the fiduciary model to impose positive duties to protect the environment and prevent climate change is likely to be difficult in Australia due to the High Court's recent statements on fiduciary theory.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter examines the nature of fiduciary duties in Australia and the direction the High Court of Australia has been taking in relation to fiduciary theory. It focuses on whether climate change fiduciary duties are possible under Australian general law. The chapter reviews the types of fiduciary duties that could be recognised in light of the High Court's more recent statements on the fiduciary principle. The fiduciary principle has not traditionally been limited to the conflicts and profits rules. For example, company directors have for many years been subject to additional fiduciary duties. A number of commentators and judges have expressed the view that Australian fiduciary duties are now limited to the conflicts and profits rules. The use of the fiduciary model to impose positive duties to protect the environment and prevent climate change is likely to be difficult in Australia due to the High Court's recent statements on fiduciary theory.

Key concepts: Fiduciary, Law, Relation (database), Law and economics, Business, Political science, Common law, Accounting

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Atmospheric Trust Litigation Across the World — Research Paper | ScholarLens