2018Road Materials and Pavement DesignRequires access

Comparison on properties of cement-stabilised gravel prepared by different laboratory compaction methods

Xiaoping Ji, Yueqin Hou, Xianghang Li, Tao Wang

Open publisher page 38 citations

Abstract

This paper presents a comparison of the properties of cement-stabilised gravel (CSG) prepared in laboratory by the static pressuring compaction method (SPCM) and the vibration compaction method (VCM). The compaction characteristics, gradation variation, unconfined compressive strength (UCS), splitting strength (SPS), and resilient modulus (RM) of the laboratory-prepared CSG by SPCM and VCM are measured and compared. The effects of compaction method, gradation structure, cement content, and curing time on the compaction characteristic, gradation variation, and mechanical properties of CSG are investigated. Field measurements are subsequently conducted to validate the laboratory investigations. The results show that the CSG prepared by VCM has optimum water content and smaller gradation variation and larger density than those of CSG prepared by SPCM. The UCS, SPS, and RM of CSG prepared by VCM are 1.87–2.37, 1.54–2.74, and 1.53–1.96 times those of the CSG prepared by SPCM, respectively. Moreover, the results show that the mechanical properties of CSG prepared by VCM have a correlation of 91.7% with the field drilled CSG, which is better than the SPCM.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper presents a comparison of the properties of cement-stabilised gravel (CSG) prepared in laboratory by the static pressuring compaction method (SPCM) and the vibration compaction method (VCM). The compaction characteristics, gradation variation, unconfined compressive strength (UCS), splitting strength (SPS), and resilient modulus (RM) of the laboratory-prepared CSG by SPCM and VCM are measured and compared. The effects of compaction method, gradation structure, cement content, and curing time on the compaction characteristic, gradation variation, and mechanical properties of CSG are investigated. Field measurements are subsequently conducted to validate the laboratory investigations. The results show that the CSG prepared by VCM has optimum water content and smaller gradation variation and larger density than those of CSG prepared by SPCM. The UCS, SPS, and RM of CSG prepared by VCM are 1.87–2.37, 1.54–2.74, and 1.53–1.96 times those of the CSG prepared by SPCM, respectively. Moreover, the results show that the mechanical properties of CSG prepared by VCM have a correlation of 91.7% with the field drilled CSG, which is better than the SPCM.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 38 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper presents a comparison of the properties of cement-stabilised gravel (CSG) prepared in laboratory by the static pressuring compaction method (SPCM) and the vibration compaction method (VCM). The compaction characteristics, gradation variation, unconfined compressive strength (UCS), splitting strength (SPS), and resilient modulus (RM) of the laboratory-prepared CSG by SPCM and VCM are measured and compared. The effects of compaction method, gradation structure, cement content, and curing time on the compaction characteristic, gradation variation, and mechanical properties of CSG are investigated. Field measurements are subsequently conducted to validate the laboratory investigations. The results show that the CSG prepared by VCM has optimum water content and smaller gradation variation and larger density than those of CSG prepared by SPCM. The UCS, SPS, and RM of CSG prepared by VCM are 1.87–2.37, 1.54–2.74, and 1.53–1.96 times those of the CSG prepared by SPCM, respectively. Moreover, the results show that the mechanical properties of CSG prepared by VCM have a correlation of 91.7% with the field drilled CSG, which is better than the SPCM.

Key concepts: Gradation, Compaction, Compressive strength, Cement, Materials science, Curing (chemistry), Composite material, Geotechnical engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison on properties of cement-stabilised gravel prepared by different laboratory compaction methods — Research Paper | ScholarLens